Search for: "United States v. Cores" Results 681 - 700 of 3,710
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Nov 2016, 3:49 am by Edith Roberts
First up is State Farm Fire & Casualty Co. v. [read post]
6 May 2014, 2:05 pm by Christopher Lund
  No one’s sentiments will be controlled by the opinions of the Supreme Court of the United States. [read post]
26 Sep 2021, 8:08 pm by Francis Pileggi
The Delaware Supreme Court has announced a revised standard for an important aspect of corporate litigation: the analysis of pre-suit demand futility for purposes of pursuing a derivative stockholder claim, in United Food and Commercial Workers Union and Participating Food Industry Employers Tri-State Pension Fund. v. [read post]
14 Oct 2016, 3:01 am by Walter Olson
CBP [United States Customs and Border Protection] agents saw them, arrested them, seized their cameras, and deleted their pictures. [read post]
5 Apr 2007, 3:26 pm
" The brief also disputes arguments by the state of Texas that the case is now moot, and that the Supreme Court has already decided the core issues involved. [read post]
6 Apr 2016, 4:00 pm
This would require riding roughshod over Article IV, §1 of the United States Constitution, section 1913, subdivision (a) of the California Code of Civil Procedure, and time honored principles of res judicata and collateral estoppel. [read post]
25 Jun 2024, 4:21 am by Michael C. Dorf
That provision renders non-citizens inadmissible to the U.S. if the deciding consular or other government official "knows, or has reasonable ground to believe" that the non-citizen "seeks to enter the United States to engage solely, principally, or incidentally in any . . . unlawful activity. [read post]
27 Jun 2022, 5:36 am by Bernard Bell
Regulatory Background The Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and Management Act (“MSA”) establishes a program to conserve and manage of fishery resources within 200 nautical miles of the United States coastline. [read post]
17 Oct 2013, 9:01 pm by John Dean
The Justice Department’s analysis states that since the Supreme Court’s 1910 ruling in Hass v Henkel and its 1924 ruling in Hammererschmidt v. [read post]
23 Dec 2024, 9:54 am by Eric Goldman
NetChoice case delivered a mangled interpretation of Section 230 even though Section 230 wasn’t the core issue in that case (the First Amendment was). [read post]