Search for: "United States v. Cores" Results 681 - 700 of 4,009
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Aug 2013, 7:57 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
One must not forget that tribal immunity is a creature of the federal courts, and is not expressly recognized by Congress, the United States Constitution, or Indian treaties. [read post]
30 Aug 2013, 7:57 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
One must not forget that tribal immunity is a creature of the federal courts, and is not expressly recognized by Congress, the United States Constitution, or Indian treaties. [read post]
8 Aug 2022, 8:43 am by Michael Caruso
Perhaps The Judicial Conference of the United States should do the same for judges. [read post]
4 Apr 2013, 9:10 am by Rahul Bhagnari, ACLU
Yesterday, we filed a friend-of-the-court brief in the Supreme Court in a case called United States Agency for International Development v. [read post]
9 Feb 2017, 9:22 am by Paul Rosenzweig
(v) Effective immediately, it is the policy of the United States to build a more modern, more secure, and more resilient Executive Branch IT architecture. [read post]
27 Feb 2015, 10:37 am by By Chase Strangio, Staff Attorney, ACLU
” That is what Edie Windsor imagined her late spouse, Thea Spyer, would have said after their love story brought down the core of the federal Defense of Marriage Act in United States v. [read post]
13 Aug 2021, 11:31 am by Scott Bomboy
So what are the core constitutional issues in these mask controversies? [read post]
25 Nov 2019, 2:14 am
It serves both as the outward expression of the core of the Basic Line of the Chinese Communist Party as the leadership collective of the nation, as well as the current manifestation of that Basic Line as the principles of the “New Era” theory developed by the current leadership core of the Chinese State and its Communist Party collective, which along with the elements of the United Front, represents the collective of the Chinese nation. [read post]
28 Jun 2010, 1:29 pm by Vicki Shiah
According to the New York Times, petitioners plan to seek review of the decision by the United States Supreme Court. [read post]
11 Mar 2010, 2:44 pm by Steve Bainbridge
This understanding of Dirks was implicitly confirmed by the Supreme Court’s more recent decision in United States v. [read post]