Search for: "United States v. Dean" Results 681 - 700 of 1,475
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Oct 2015, 9:01 pm by John Dean
It was my word against that of the President of the United States, who was corroborated by former attorney general John Mitchell, former assistant to the president John Ehrlichman, and former assistant to the pre [read post]
8 Oct 2015, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar
The Power of Public Labor Unions In California, as in many other states, a public sector bargaining unit may, by majority vote, elect to create an “agency shop” in which the union is the collective bargaining agent on behalf of all the employees. [read post]
  Most recently of all, in Nicklinson (Nicklinson and Lamb v the United Kingdom), the ECtH [read post]
15 Sep 2015, 11:13 pm by Ben Reeve-Lewis
There may well be a problem in inner city areas, given benefit caps v. market rents and shortage of accommodation, but big cities are only a small part of Britain. [read post]
3 Sep 2015, 9:01 pm by John Dean
The Washington Post was first to report a former aide to Hillary Clinton, Bryan Pagliano, will invoke the Fifth Amendment to avoid the subpoena seeking his testimony from several congressional committees hell-bent on derailing the former Secretary of State’s efforts to become President of the United States. [read post]
22 Jul 2015, 2:43 pm
Bernal, Judge of the United States District Court, Central District of California.Historical and personal perspectives will be presented by Ms. [read post]
25 Jun 2015, 9:01 pm by John Dean
Nixon and Kissinger negotiated the Paris Peace Accords and ended the Vietnam War for the United States in January 1973. [read post]
18 Jun 2015, 3:35 pm by Jack Sharman
Almost two decades ago, I learned several lessons as a Congressional lawyer, some more useful than others. [read post]
11 Jun 2015, 9:01 pm by John Dean
Two days later, the United States Supreme Court decided Roe v. [read post]
10 Jun 2015, 4:32 pm by D. Daxton White
Dean Witter Reynolds, Inc., 537 U.S. 79, 83 (2002), the United States Supreme Court determined that the predecessor NASD six year rule was a procedural matter that is presumptively for this Panel to decide and is not a substantive limitation. [read post]
8 Jun 2015, 3:45 am by Ron Coleman
 This seemed to have been confirmed by the decision, not long afterwards, in Penguin Group (USA) Inc. v. [read post]