Search for: "United States v. George"
Results 681 - 700
of 3,632
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Sep 2010, 1:27 pm
As such, many gamers bought Plants v. [read post]
6 Feb 2012, 11:16 am
The Supreme Court of the United States recognized in Southland Corp. v. [read post]
22 Feb 2012, 4:53 pm
In Sosa v. [read post]
29 Mar 2010, 6:48 pm
And Cuccinelli issued a follow-up op-ed, stating: "Critics of my advisory seem to ignore the fact that individuals are already protected from irrational discrimination by a governmental body under the equal protection clause of the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution. [read post]
6 Mar 2014, 4:14 pm
§ 1595a(c)(1)(A), which says, "Merchandise which is introduced or attempted to be introduced into the United States contrary to law shall be ... seized and forfeited if it is stolen, smuggled, or clandestinely imported or introduced." [read post]
15 Dec 2009, 7:07 am
" State v. [read post]
29 Nov 2011, 2:32 am
In Lambert v. [read post]
17 May 2010, 5:49 am
Justice Clark read his opinion for the Court in United States v. [read post]
5 Jul 2024, 8:18 am
Rachel Levine, the United States Assistant Secretary for Health and a transgender woman, with text that reads: “‘I’m an expert on mental health and food disorders. [read post]
8 Jun 2014, 9:38 pm
" Vaillancourt at *4.A Patent Owner Alone Can AppealThe applicable version of § 141 states, in pertinent part: “[a] patent owner . . . in an inter partes reexamination proceeding . . . dissatisfied with the final decision in an appeal to the Board. . .may appeal the decision only to the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit. [read post]
18 Aug 2013, 10:47 am
Both make the same basic point: The Constitution unequivocally gives the President of the United States the power to pardon anyone for any crime committed against the United States. [read post]
15 Dec 2009, 7:42 am
STATE V. [read post]
26 May 2017, 3:29 pm
Even if Plaintiffs’ public nudity at political rallies was entitled to First Amendment protection, however, we hold that the challenged ordinance is a valid, content-neutral regulation as applied to Plaintiffs’ expressive conduct under United States v. [read post]
27 Jul 2009, 10:40 am
United States, 495 U.S. 575, 110 S. [read post]
22 Jul 2023, 11:41 am
The approval is in defiance of the US Supreme Court ruling in Allen v. [read post]
18 Mar 2011, 10:04 am
United States, 597 F. [read post]
6 Jun 2023, 9:47 am
Dist. of California (9th Cir. 1983) (holding that "pretrial documents, such as those dealing with the question whether [the defendant] should be incarcerated prior to trial … are often important to a full understanding of the way in which the judicial process and the government as a whole are functioning"); United States v. [read post]
1 Jul 2017, 9:09 pm
” United States v. [read post]
17 Sep 2013, 7:56 pm
V. [read post]
14 Jan 2007, 7:57 am
Sullivan, 532 U.S. 769, 771-72 (2001) (reversing granting of motion to suppress based on officer's alleged "improper subjective motivation"); United States v. [read post]
