Search for: "United States v. Gonzalez"
Results 681 - 700
of 805
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Jul 2023, 4:40 am
” Lawrence III, supra, at 803; see Arroyo Gonzalez v. [read post]
6 May 2009, 7:26 pm
NSSTA's backward step: Re-focus on "protecting, preserving and promoting" structured settlement laws already enacted in the United States Internal Revenue Code and 47 state structured settlement protection statutes; Consolidate and transition NSSTA's administrative, financial and political strengths. [read post]
4 Nov 2022, 7:56 am
’”[1] It offers some enhanced protections to visual artists working in the United States. [read post]
11 Oct 2023, 11:17 am
Back in March, the Supreme Court invited the solicitor general to file a brief expressing the views of the United States on these cases. [read post]
13 Aug 2022, 5:51 pm
United States, 959 F.2d 1558, 1561 (11th Cir. 1992). [read post]
8 May 2015, 8:15 am
STATE OF TEXAS, No. 14-0226 Disposed on orders list of May 8, 2015 CITY OF DALLAS v. [read post]
15 May 2013, 6:55 am
Justice Richter found that the Supreme Court ignored its own custody schedule when it stated that the parents here shared “very nearly equal” physical custody of the child. [read post]
2 Oct 2015, 2:57 am
SABAM followed by Sabam v. [read post]
23 Jan 2023, 4:55 pm
It does not get more cyberlawyerly than a case the Supreme Court will be taking up this term – Gonzalez v. [read post]
16 Jul 2023, 10:41 pm
EMPLOYMENT RELATIONSHIPS ■ Ortega Gonzalez, Applicant v. [read post]
20 Sep 2022, 12:39 am
Apple litigation in the Northern District of California, the antitrust case that will be heard by the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit in one month from tomorrow, with the Department of Justice supporting Epic. [read post]
8 Feb 2024, 6:40 pm
Taamneh and Gonzalez v. [read post]
1 May 2021, 7:19 am
You can click on any of the links below to go straight to the part you're most interested in:Effective App Store commission ("App Store tax") rate peaks at 35.25% (plus annual developer program fee plus Search Ads) -- a relative increase by 17.5%IP-related issues surrounding web appsRecent United States Senate hearing: mixed blessing for Epic's caseStatement of Objections from the European Commission's Directorate-General for Competition (DG COMP) in the… [read post]
21 Nov 2022, 11:45 pm
In my recent analysis of the rule-of-reason balancing question in Epic Games v. [read post]
14 May 2022, 1:51 am
Techs., LLC v. [read post]
26 Oct 2022, 5:40 am
Apple judgment by Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers of the United States District Court for the Northern District of California. [read post]
3 Aug 2022, 12:07 am
United States District Court for the Northern District of California. [read post]
10 Jun 2008, 2:36 pm
Rowan, No. 05-30536 On remand from the Supreme Court of the United States, a 60-month sentence of supervised release following a conviction for possession of child pornography is affirmed where: 1) defendant's sentence is a non-Guideline sentence since it falls outside the applicable range and was not based on an allowed departure; but 2) in light of the deferential standard set forth in Gall, there was no significant procedural error in the sentencing decision. [read post]
18 Apr 2022, 1:14 am
In the Ninth Circuit appeal of the Epic Games v. [read post]
1 Oct 2022, 11:17 pm
In this regard, they've made concessions lately--concession that in my view don't go far enough to address competition concerns, but which nevertheless represent (limited) progress.On June 10, 2022, Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers of the United States District Court for the Northern District of California formally approved (PDF) a class-action settlement between small app developers and Apple. [read post]
