Search for: "United States v. Mark"
Results 681 - 700
of 10,388
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
31 Jan 2015, 4:23 pm
Holmes v. [read post]
15 Dec 2016, 4:22 am
United States and Overton v. [read post]
29 Jun 2008, 3:34 pm
United States v. [read post]
1 Feb 2018, 5:17 am
Briggs & Stratton Power Products Group, LLC, United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit, No. 2016-2197, 12 January 2018 appeared first on Kluwer Patent Blog. [read post]
6 Feb 2018, 9:41 am
Notably, the United States Supreme Court, in Ohio v. [read post]
10 Jul 2016, 9:09 am
” (Slip Op. at 18) (citing United States v. [read post]
4 Jun 2021, 12:06 pm
Clark v. [read post]
21 May 2007, 6:08 am
If we are wrong and state tax laws favoring in-state municipal bonds are shielded by United Haulers, it will mark a significant extension of the nascent state-run business exception to the Dormant Commerce Clause. [read post]
10 Jan 2012, 3:30 pm
My team is the United States armed forces. [read post]
3 Sep 2015, 3:26 am
The Hungarian Intellectual Property Office (HIPO) found that Unilever had sold large quantities of and publicised the goods designated by its CTM IMPULSE (which seem to be some sort of perfumed and/or deodorant body spray) the United Kingdom and Italy, with that mark enjoying a 5% market share in the United Kingdom and a 0.2% market share in Italy. [read post]
8 Aug 2009, 12:01 am
See United States v. [read post]
24 Jan 2008, 2:00 am
United States, 424 U.S. 800 (1976). [read post]
14 Dec 2020, 3:46 am
Corp. v. [read post]
26 Sep 2022, 3:26 am
PepsiCo, Inc. v. [read post]
10 May 2011, 9:41 am
In United States v. [read post]
26 Jul 2015, 12:07 pm
It is critical to conduct a trademark clearance search prior to filing any trademark application at the United States Patent & Trademark Office, including an application seeking registration for a mark that includes a surname. [read post]
19 Sep 2022, 4:22 pm
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Defendant-Appellant. [read post]
17 Apr 2007, 8:50 pm
The Board observed that "[t]he popularity of motion pictures in the United States cannot be overstated. [read post]
15 Apr 2008, 7:48 pm
In 2003, he pled guilty to one count of “counterfeit of a registered mark” in violation of California Penal Code § 350(a)(2), which imposes criminal penalties on any person who “willfully manufactures, intentionally sells, or knowingly possesses for sale any counterfeit of a mark registered with the Secretary of State or registered on the Principal Register of the United States Patent and Trademark… [read post]
11 Feb 2021, 4:58 am
The United States Olympic Committee v. [read post]
