Search for: "United States v. Price"
Results 681 - 700
of 5,317
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Nov 2021, 4:00 am
The case of Epic Games v. [read post]
8 Jun 2023, 7:43 am
In the United States, rebates are negotiated by PBMs, whose function is to define formularies on behalf of health insurers. [read post]
12 Mar 2010, 9:26 am
Or, looking at the issue another way, does the fact that the conduct permitted by Citizens United was legal in 26 states prior to Citizens United, suggest that politicians are hopelessly corrupt in over half our states? [read post]
16 Sep 2014, 3:13 pm
By Jason Rantanen VirnetX, Inc. v. [read post]
4 Feb 2014, 11:17 am
In Steginsky v. [read post]
25 Jun 2009, 11:32 am
By Brian VillaIn Northern Indiana Public Service Co. v. [read post]
30 Mar 2011, 10:16 am
Currently there are 500 charging stations in the United States and 400 of them are in California. [read post]
17 Apr 2018, 12:00 am
In Desta v. [read post]
20 Oct 2011, 5:00 am
In Curry v. [read post]
7 Jul 2015, 8:25 am
In WIT Associates, Inc. v. [read post]
28 Aug 2011, 8:16 am
United States v. [read post]
19 Jan 2012, 9:01 pm
Nemier v. [read post]
17 Apr 2007, 10:00 am
Capstone Capital, LLC, a container of men's apparel shipped to the United States went unclaimed by the buyer due to the lack of financing. [read post]
13 Jun 2013, 2:21 pm
The United States Supreme Court issued another blow to patent-eligible subject matter in the United States, ruling that naturally occurring DNA elements are not eligible for patenting. [read post]
14 Jan 2009, 1:02 pm
United States that non-systematic negligence by police officers fall within the scope of the good-faith exception to the exclusionary rule. [read post]
4 Nov 2024, 6:11 am
United States, 549 U.S. 457 (2007). [read post]
29 Aug 2018, 10:49 am
§3583(h) in a case of first impression In United States v. [read post]
Bowman v Monsanto: the US Supreme Court rules on patent exhaustion and replication of patented seeds
14 May 2013, 2:09 pm
Yesterday, the Supreme Court of the United States delivered its long-awaited judgment in the case of Bowman v Monsanto Co. et Al., unanimously ruling that 'patent exhaustion does not permit a farmer to reproduce patented seeds through planting and harvesting without the patent holder's permission'. [read post]
26 Jan 2016, 6:10 am
Briefly: At Balkinization, Zach Price weighs in on Puerto Rico v. [read post]
13 Sep 2017, 7:11 pm
Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3026779 “The United States federal judiciary maintains a system called PACER, “Public Access to Court Electronic Records. [read post]
