Search for: "United States v. Sotomayor"
Results 681 - 700
of 3,518
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Apr 2022, 5:28 am
In United States v. [read post]
7 Jun 2009, 5:11 am
I am a citizen of the United States because only in the United States does citizenship start with our creator. [read post]
23 Jan 2018, 5:08 am
This is the so-called "WOTUS" case, concerning legal challenges to the Obama Administration's regulation re-defining "Waters of the United States" under the Clean Water Act. [read post]
7 Mar 2017, 12:07 pm
United States in sketching her vision. [read post]
1 Feb 2012, 6:34 am
The Court’s recent opinion in United States v. [read post]
23 Nov 2015, 12:49 pm
United States v. [read post]
20 Nov 2015, 5:04 pm
United States v. [read post]
1 Jun 2015, 2:29 pm
Kennedy, Breyer, and Sotomayor do not join the lone footnote, which is about criticism of a 1992 decision in this area, Dewsnup v. [read post]
12 Dec 2013, 7:20 am
On Tuesday, the Court dismissed the union organizing case UNITE Here Local 355 v. [read post]
25 Jun 2021, 8:41 am
Justice Sonia Sotomayor wrote the opinion in Yellen v. [read post]
27 Mar 2014, 6:54 am
They issued just one decision, in United States v. [read post]
9 Nov 2009, 1:50 pm
The petitioner pointed out that the United States is different and that it would be difficult to define "technology based" in the United States. [read post]
9 Nov 2009, 1:50 pm
 The petitioner pointed out that the United States is different and that it would be difficult to define "technology based" in the United States. [read post]
1 Mar 2016, 9:39 am
United States, No. 14-8358:Defendants convicted of possessing child pornography in violation of 18 U. [read post]
13 Jun 2011, 8:04 am
Alito, Jr. delivered the opinion of the Court in United States v. [read post]
22 May 2010, 7:28 am
The question before us is not whether international law prohibits the United States from imposing the sentence at issue in this case. [read post]
24 Jun 2010, 8:58 am
Citing Buckley v. [read post]
22 Apr 2013, 6:28 pm
McNeely the United States Supreme Court held that police must normally get a warrant before taking a non-consensual blood sample to test a driver's blood alcohol level. [read post]
10 Oct 2017, 5:12 am
In Kiobel v. [read post]
7 Dec 2010, 1:54 pm
United States (No. 09-6822) requires the Court to further sort through the implications and consequences of its landmark ruling in United States v. [read post]
