Search for: "United States v. State of Alaska" Results 681 - 700 of 1,150
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
Eleven states (Alaska, Arizona, Georgia, Massachusetts, Michigan, Missouri, New Hampshire, New Mexico, North Carolina, Ohio and Texas) allow a family member, friend, caregiver or member of the voter’s household—some allow all four—to drop off mail-in ballots on the voter’s behalf. [read post]
6 Apr 2016, 6:00 am by Amy Howe
United States, holding that the pretrial restraint of a criminal defendant’s untainted asset violates the Sixth Amendment, concluding that “what seems on its face like a clear rule may prove challenging for courts to apply in practice. [read post]
17 Sep 2019, 9:01 am by Jeffrey Mitchell
  While prospects for significant federal spending on a new broadband program remain in limbo, Congress has allocated further funding to the United States Department of Agriculture (“USDA”) ReConnect funding for 2020 (item below). [read post]
27 Apr 2010, 2:27 pm by Bill Araiza
  If the Second Amendment is incorporated against the states does that mean that Alaskans have fewer Second Amendment rights because the "right [that] was understood at the time" that Alaska was admitted was presumably the understanding in United States v. [read post]
31 Mar 2014, 1:47 pm by Kurt Carroll
A 2010 GAO report found that United States Attorneys declined to prosecute 52% of the cases classified as violent crimes in fiscal years 2005 through 2009. [read post]
23 Jul 2021, 4:00 am by Michael Woods and Gordon LaFortune
”[12] In its brief, Canada points to the long history of Canada-U.S. cooperation[13] and that it was the United States which pursued the 1977 pipeline treaty to protect a pipeline running from Alaska through Canadian territory to the U.S. [read post]
12 Apr 2019, 8:15 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
H.R.2029: To direct the Comptroller General of the United States to submit a report on the response of law enforcement agencies to reports of missing or murdered Indians. [read post]
16 Jul 2009, 8:17 pm
This is the abstract:In 2003, the United States Supreme Court issued its only two opinions regarding the constitutionality of sex offender registration and notification statutes. [read post]
1 Aug 2008, 3:45 pm
8-1-2008 National:Abstract: In 2003, the United States Supreme Court issued its only two opinions regarding the constitutionality of sex offender registration and notification statutes. [read post]