Search for: "United States v. State of South Carolina"
Results 681 - 700
of 1,557
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Dec 2017, 6:45 am
See also Selective Insurance Co. of South Carolina v. [read post]
8 Jul 2014, 11:00 am
Board Decision and Girl Scouts of the United States” Commentator: Martha Jones Closing Comments: Sarah Barringer Gordon [read post]
15 Jun 2019, 1:01 am
Calhoun of South Carolina; and Daniel Webster of Massachusetts. [read post]
8 Sep 2016, 7:40 am
" (Recommendation p. 10).If that is what the Ethics Council is suggesting, it presents an interesting and useful application of the 2nd Pillar of the United Nations Guiding Principles for Business and Human Rights (corporate responsibility to respect human rights) to enterprises independent of their legal obligations under the more formally legal 2st Pillar state duty to protect human rights. [read post]
22 Jul 2009, 8:26 pm
Adoption of these four exceptions aligns South Carolina with the majority of states that have adopted these same four exceptions. [read post]
19 Sep 2013, 2:37 pm
Although the Bland decision is “The Law” only in the states under its jurisdiction (North Carolina, South Carolina, Virginia and West Virginia), the court’s reasoning is sound and likely to be followed in other jurisdictions. [read post]
7 Feb 2018, 2:40 am
In 1777, the Executive Council of Georgia authorized the purchase of needed supplies from a South Carolina businessman. [read post]
7 Feb 2017, 2:40 am
In 1777, the Executive Council of Georgia authorized the purchase of needed supplies from a South Carolina businessman. [read post]
4 May 2022, 9:01 pm
Last month, Judge Green of the Los Angeles County Superior Court in Crest v. [read post]
28 Jul 2024, 6:30 am
Ogden to Cherokee Nation v. [read post]
19 Mar 2021, 11:26 am
The Gresham v. [read post]
5 May 2017, 3:00 am
The South Carolina Supreme Court accepted four certified questions from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina: (1) Under South Carolina law, when a plaintiff seeks recovery from a person, other than his employer, for an injury sustained on the job, may the jury hear an explanation of why the employer is not part of the instant action? [read post]
16 Aug 2014, 12:15 pm
Sebelius and King v. [read post]
21 Jan 2010, 1:15 am
" SUPREME COURT South Carolina v. [read post]
13 Dec 2021, 1:38 pm
Ky. 2012) (purchases of properties in Kentucky and South Carolina); United States v. [read post]
14 Jul 2023, 10:32 am
South Carolina Conference of the NAACP, the justices will consider a challenge to the congressional redistricting map that South Carolina’s Republican-controlled legislature enacted after the 2020 census. [read post]
5 Sep 2017, 1:05 am
South Carolina Coastal Council, 505 U.S. 1003 (1992)), and they failed to establish that they suffered a taking under the more general test of Penn Central Trans. [read post]
5 Sep 2017, 1:05 am
South Carolina Coastal Council, 505 U.S. 1003 (1992)), and they failed to establish that they suffered a taking under the more general test of Penn Central Trans. [read post]
27 Oct 2023, 7:12 am
South Carolina seeks review again. [read post]
30 Sep 2015, 9:30 am
The problem stems from an overbroad and poorly monitored federal regulation, upheld by the US Supreme Court in Thornburgh v. [read post]
