Search for: "V D"
Results 681 - 700
of 76,322
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Jan 2017, 7:36 am
Blackfeet Housing (D. [read post]
29 Sep 2020, 2:17 pm
Stern, No. 1:20-cv-00005 (D. [read post]
4 Feb 2011, 1:52 am
Kasprzak v Warsaw Regional Court, Poland; Bingham v Trial Court No 4 of Marbella, Spain; Wilson-Campbell v Court of Instruction No 4 of Orihuela, Alicante, Spain [2011] EWHC 100 (Admin); [2011] WLR (D) 35 “Article 23 of the Council Framework Decision of 13 June 2002 on the European arrest warrant and the surrender procedures between member states, as implemented by s 36(3)(b) of the Extradition Act 2003, contemplated the possibility of agreement being sought… [read post]
20 Jan 2009, 1:53 am
R v Khan and others [2009] EWCA Crim 2; [2009] WLR (D) 8 “Where a member of the same household as a child or vulnerable adult was charged with allowing his or her death, the question whether the defendant had had frequent contact with him or her was a free-standing question, unrelated to issues whether that [...] [read post]
17 Mar 2009, 2:56 am
Sinclair v Glatt and others [2009] EWCA Civ 176; [2009] WLR (D) 97 “A receiver appointed pursuant to s 77 of the Criminal Justice Act 1988 to get in the assets of a convicted money launderer was entitled to recover his remuneration, costs and expenses from the realisable assets caught by the order. [read post]
2 Apr 2009, 2:21 am
R (A) v Secretary of State for Health [2009] EWCA Civ 225; [2009] WLR (D) 113 “A failed asylum seeker was not ‘ordinarily resident’ within the United Kingdom for the purposes of entitlement to treatment as of right by the National Health Service free of charge. [read post]
13 Mar 2009, 3:49 am
Youell v La Reunion Aerienne [2009] EWCA Civ 175; [2009] WLR (D) 95 “Where a court could otherwise determine the substance of a claim, the mere fact that the claim was the subject of an arbitration agreement did not deprive the court of its jurisdiction under Council Regulation (EC) 44/2001 on jurisdiction and the recognition and [...] [read post]
14 Oct 2010, 2:15 am
Gisda Cyf v Barratt [2010] UKSC 41; [2010] WLR (D) 250 “Where dismissal without notice was communicated to an employee in a letter, the contract of employment did not terminate until the employee had actually read the letter or had had a reasonable opportunity of reading it. [read post]
24 Feb 2009, 1:42 am
Protectacoat Firthglow Ltd v Szilagyi [2009] EWCA Civ 98; [2009] WLR (D) 67 “In determining whether a person who had carried out work for a company was its employee within the meaning of s 230 of the Employment Rights Act 1996, if the document purporting to retain the services of a person did not represent the [...] [read post]
28 Feb 2011, 1:44 am
Regina v Vasili [2011] WLR (D) 58 “If an object had all the characteristics of a flick knife, it would therefore be considered an offensive weapon per se: the fact that the same object functioned also as a lighter did not stop it being an offensive weapon. [read post]
11 Feb 2010, 2:55 am
R v Carter (David) [2010] WLR (D) 29 “Where a member of the jury had to be discharged, at whatever stage of the trial, there was no requirement that the remaining members of the jury be directed to ignore the views expressed on any subject by the departed juror. [read post]
7 Jul 2009, 2:35 am
Masood and others v Zahoor and others [2009] EWCA 650; [2009] WLR (D) 231 “Where a claimant relied on a forged document he forfeited the right to have an adjudication of his claim, and it was irrelevant that the defendant also relied on forged documents. [read post]
2 Mar 2009, 3:00 am
Office of Communications v Information Comr; [2009] WLR (D) 71 “When balancing the public interest in maintaining an exception to disclosure of environmental information against the public interest in its disclosure the correct test was to consider whether the aggregate public interest in maintaining the exception outweighed the public interest in disclosure. [read post]
3 Sep 2008, 9:21 am
Cir. 1995) (en banc), aff'd, 517 U.S. 370 (1996); see also Hoechst Celanese Corp. v. [read post]
15 Jun 2009, 2:16 am
Hanoman v Southwark London Borough Council (No 2) [2009] UKHL 29; [2009] WLR (D) 181 “The requirement that a local authority which had delayed processing a ‘right to buy’ claim under Pt V of the Housing Act 1985 should deduct from the purchase price the purchasing tenant's rent payments during the period of delay remained applicable [...] [read post]
30 Apr 2012, 3:13 am
Adams and others v Ford and others [2012] EWCA Civ 544; [2012] WLR (D) 125 “It was not right to lay down a categorical rule that the issue of proceedings without valid authority from a claimant ought necessarily to amount to an abuse of the process of the court. [read post]
15 Aug 2023, 12:25 pm
Vikram D. [read post]
20 Jul 2009, 1:49 pm
D-469,840, entitled "Air Gun Sight," keeping in mind the CAFC's recent decision in Egyptian Goddess, Inc. v. [read post]
13 Nov 2008, 10:30 am
R v Moulden [2008] EWCA Crim 2561; [2008] WLR (D) 352 “In s 6(2)(a) of the Proceeds of Crime Act 2002, the words ‘proceedings before the Crown Court’ meant proceedings under a single indictment. [read post]
