Search for: "V R v. State of Indiana" Results 681 - 700 of 1,757
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Sep 2014, 7:39 am by Joy Waltemath
Finally, conflict preemption describes a situation where it is not possible for a party to comply with both the federal law and state law or where state law is an obstacle to fulfilling federal law, and the court did not perceive that Indiana wage statutes and common law contract principles required employer conduct inconsistent with INA requirements or that enforcing state law would “stand as an obstacle” to the INA. [read post]
7 Nov 2014, 5:52 am
  By our count, federal judges have trampled over state sovereignty with respect to the heeding presumption in no fewer than eleven states – Alaska, Colorado (despite contrary state-court authority), Georgia, Hawaii, Illinois, Iowa, Kentucky, Maine, New York (despite contrary state-court authority), South Dakota, and Wyoming.Finally, because various states have taken quite different approaches to whether a heeding presumption exists at all and… [read post]
24 Sep 2014, 7:21 am
Plaintiff alleges that Defendants illegally intercepted and broadcast the Julio Cesar Chavez, Jr. v. [read post]
2 Jul 2008, 1:38 pm
Francesca Jarosz of the Indianapolis Star reports today on yesterday's opinion by federal district judge Sarah Evans Barker in the case of Big Hat Books v. [read post]
28 Sep 2011, 11:07 am
San Diego - In a controversial decision, the Federal Circuit recently upheld a District Court ruling in favor of Monsanto in the patent infringement case Monsanto Company v. [read post]
10 May 2007, 1:58 pm
On Wednesday, Huntington Circuit Judge Thomas Hakes heard arguments about the April contamination, with the state arguing the manure in the water was the latest in a long line of violations at the dairy and DeGroot's attorneys arguing the contamination in the water had not been linked to DeGroot's herd.The following are the Supreme Court docket entries in the case of STATE OF INDIANA, ex rel DEGROOT v. [read post]
22 Oct 2007, 5:57 am
This week's oral arguments before the Court of Appeals that will NOT be webcast: This Monday, Oct. 22nd: 1:00 PM - State of Indiana v. [read post]
9 Sep 2014, 9:01 pm by Michael C. Dorf
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit invalidated the Indiana and Wisconsin bans in Baskin v. [read post]
30 Jun 2016, 9:01 pm by John Dean
While there is a so-called “political question” doctrine, first established in Luther v. [read post]