Search for: "Valley of California, Inc." Results 681 - 700 of 968
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Nov 2023, 9:09 pm by Ilana Korchia
In response to this investigation, California Splendor, Inc. of San Diego, California voluntarily recalled certain lots of 4-lb. bags of Kirkland Signature Frozen Organic Whole Strawberries that were sold at Costco stores in Los Angeles, California; Hawaii; and two San Diego, California business centers. [read post]
5 Mar 2009, 2:00 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Think Tank Global Week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com]   Highlights this week included: Amazon backs down over Kindle 2 audio feature to avoid likely copyright battle with Authors’ Guild (Silicon Valley IP Licensing Law Blog) (Lessig) (Techdirt) (Michael Geist) (Excess Copyright) (Ars Technica) (Public Knowledge) (Excess Copyright) Pirate Bay trial wraps up; Prosecutor calls for jail time (TorrentFreak)… [read post]
30 Jan 2008, 12:09 am
In affirming the 2nd District Court of Appeal's decision in Marathon Entertainment Inc. v. [read post]
24 Apr 2020, 5:00 am by Erik Manukyan
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit greenlighted a mix of privacy claims levied against Facebook in In Re Facebook, Inc. [read post]
14 Mar 2010, 10:47 pm by admin
The following is a summary review of articles from all over the nation concerning environmental law settlements, decisions, regulatory actions and lawsuits filed during the past week. [read post]
9 Oct 2007, 12:59 am
But outside California, that colloquialism often draws blank looks. [read post]
1 Oct 2007, 1:08 am
Rosenberg, who joined Apple last fall as the company grappled with stock option backdating trouble, will stay in California at San Diego-based Qualcomm Inc., a company with its own share of legal troubles, including a wide array of litigation against rival Broadcom. [read post]
10 Apr 2013, 10:47 am by Abbott & Kindermann
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORTS Court Affirms EIR For 30 Year Mining Operation; Erroneous Impact Conclusion Did Not Invalidate The EIR Save Cuyama Valley v. [read post]
28 Jan 2013, 2:38 pm by Paralegal Mentor
I am a Senior Corporate and Securities Paralegal working in the Silicon Valley for Infoblox Inc., a tech company based in Santa Clara, California, that provides Automated Network Control solutions, and that became a publicly traded company in early 2012 (NYSE: BLOX).I have been in the legal profession for nearly 25 years, having served in the Corporate Legal departments of several leading public companies such as Starbucks Coffee Company, Expedia.com, Infospace.com,… [read post]
22 Mar 2007, 1:36 am
Visit Large Law Firm Silicon Valley IP Lawyers Are Cleaning Up With Clean-Tech Clients IP Law & Business Silicon Valley is experiencing a boom in the number of green-tech startups, companies that are developing environmentally friendly technology and products ranging from energy-efficient light bulbs to bioengineered molecules that excrete biofuel. [read post]
29 Jun 2009, 1:00 am
(ITC 337 Law Blog) US Patents – Decisions CAFC: Effect of a stipulated dismissal: Garber v Chicago Mercantile Exchange and the Chicago Board of Trade (Patently-O) BPAI speaks on ‘transformation’ prong: Ex Parte Hardwick (12:01 Tuesday) ITC issues final determination of s 337 violation in investigation based on complaint lodged by Samsung against Sharp concerning LCD devices (ITC 337 Law Blog) ITC decides not to review enforcement initial determination that… [read post]
18 Aug 2021, 5:55 am by Kevin Kaufman
Three cities—Fremont, Oakland, and Oxnard, California—saw sales tax rate increases of 1 percent or more in the first half of 2021. [read post]
16 Aug 2022, 6:24 am by Richard Hunt
While the decision is binding on lower courts, it isn’t binding on other California appellate courts or on the California Supreme Court, to which Marinez v. [read post]
9 Jun 2012, 5:13 am by Russell Beck
California: On May 14, 2012, the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California issued a lengthy decision (Vance’s Foods, Inc. v. [read post]