Search for: "Vermont Department of Justice" Results 681 - 695 of 695
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Feb 2012, 7:42 am by Peter Rost
"It's obviously great for drug companies, its great for the lawyers, it's great for the Justice Department to bring in a token scalp every now and then, so everybody involved wins, and that is why it continues. [read post]
14 Sep 2011, 12:07 pm by Peter Rost
"It's obviously great for drug companies, its great for the lawyers, it's great for the Justice Department to bring in a token scalp every now and then, so everybody involved wins, and that is why it continues. [read post]
11 Feb 2011, 7:51 am by Peter Rost
"It's obviously great for drug companies, its great for the lawyers, it's great for the Justice Department to bring in a token scalp every now and then, so everybody involved wins, and that is why it continues. [read post]
9 Sep 2011, 8:40 am by Peter Rost
"It's obviously great for drug companies, its great for the lawyers, it's great for the Justice Department to bring in a token scalp every now and then, so everybody involved wins, and that is why it continues. [read post]
14 Sep 2011, 12:08 pm by Peter Rost
"It's obviously great for drug companies, its great for the lawyers, it's great for the Justice Department to bring in a token scalp every now and then, so everybody involved wins, and that is why it continues. [read post]
16 Apr 2013, 10:15 am by Ritika Singh
Leahy of Vermont introduced legislation to establish a “Truth Commission” to look into the U.S. behavior in the years following the September 11 attacks. [read post]
19 Jan 2023, 1:36 am by Jim Sedor
Scott Perry’s efforts to overturn the results of the 2020 presidential election in favor of Donald Trump attracted the attention of the Department of Justice, which seized Perry’s cellphone as part of its investigation into the events leading up to the insurrection, when a pro-Trump mob overran the U.S. [read post]
19 Nov 2021, 3:00 am by Jim Sedor
., a rare move by the Justice Department to escalate the consequences of a dispute involving Congress. [read post]
29 Apr 2010, 5:00 am by Bexis
  It also tells you who wrote them, if you know the abbreviations (the first letter of the Justice’s name, and if that’s ambiguous, the first letter of the first name as well). [read post]
6 Oct 2015, 3:05 am by Kevin LaCroix
  ********************************   Yesterday, the United States Supreme Court declined to hear the petition for a writ of certiorari (the “Petition”)  filed by the United States Department of Justice (“DOJ”) in United States v. [read post]
2 Apr 2010, 9:58 pm by Brian E. Barreira
Attorney General indicated that the Department of Justice would not defend the constitutionality of the law or enforce it.(2) The final judgment entered in that case declaring the law unconstitutional applies only to a limited number of attorneys. [read post]
18 Nov 2014, 1:28 pm
As shown below, the California Department of Justice (“DOJ”), which enforces Section 26820, applies the law to ban the display of any picture or physical depiction of a handgun. [read post]
19 Aug 2010, 2:50 pm by THE KONG FIRM PLLC
   The Purpose of Background Checks Employers have a number of legitimate reasons for conducting background checks: --Ensure that applicant is really qualified for the job (It is widely accepted that more than 50% of job applicants lie on their resumes) --Protect employees and others from being the victims of violent criminal activity (according to the Department of Justice, 1 out of every 32 adults has a criminal record) --Mitigate the risk of employee fraud and theft… [read post]
5 Aug 2024, 10:46 am by Robin E. Kobayashi
LexisNexis has selected some of the top “noteworthy” panel decisions issued by the California Workers’ Compensation Appeals Board during the period January through June 2024. [read post]