Search for: "Vessels v. State" Results 681 - 700 of 1,596
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Mar 2010, 11:41 am by Mark Murakami
The fishermen sued, claiming violations of federal maritime law and state wage laws. [read post]
3 Dec 2012, 2:17 am by Alexandra Allan
The judge stated that such a stay should only be granted in rare and compelling circumstances, of which there were none in this case. [read post]
13 Nov 2015, 2:00 am by Jack Kennedy, Olswang LLP
Although the vessels remained in “hot lay-up” that was not, in the majority’s view, indicative of the continuation of the business, but rather a prudent decision to make the vessels more appealing to a future purchaser. [read post]
20 Feb 2014, 12:00 pm by Jon Robinson
  Instead, the court determined that it must apply the two-prong test announced by the Supreme Court of the United States in Chandris, Inc. v. [read post]
8 Feb 2016, 1:46 pm by Gerson & Schwartz, P.A.
Historically, punitive damages in federal maritime cases were not always viable until the United States Supreme Court decided Atlantic Sounding Co, Inc, v. [read post]
18 May 2011, 6:00 am by Will Bland
   When the owner of the vessel applied for insurance he stated that the vessel had no pollution loss history. [read post]