Search for: "Viacom" Results 681 - 700 of 1,907
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Dec 2011, 10:42 am by Jonathan Bailey
No word if it was Sony who filed the takedown and, if so, why Viacom was listed as the filer. [read post]
12 Dec 2011, 8:47 am by Jonathan Bailey
YouTube, which is currently being sued by Viacom for its practices in its early years, has been working hard to secure licensing and rights to music and videos uploaded to its service and, by acquiring RightsFlow, seeks to simplify that process. [read post]
8 Dec 2011, 1:08 pm by Doug Panzer, Esq.
A federal district court judge in Wisconsin has ordered Brownmark Films to pay Viacom and Comedy Central more than $30,000 in attorney's fees after finding that their case alleging copyright infringement was as worthwhile as their "hit" YouTube video, "What What (In the Butt). [read post]
8 Dec 2011, 9:48 am by Jonathan Bailey
According to the judge, who had previously dismissed the suit in July, the use was a clear cut case of fair use and has now ordered Brownmark to pay Viacom’s legal bills, totalling over $30,000 in the case. [read post]
7 Dec 2011, 9:47 am by Eriq Gardner
Eriq Gardner Viacom is awarded $30,000 in attorneys fees in case over fair use of Samwell's viral music video and harshly criticizes the plaintiff for bringing the lawsuit.read more [read post]
1 Dec 2011, 12:00 am by Gordon Firemark
Call us with your feedback: (310) 243-6231 In this Episode: PROTECT IP /SOPA CROWD FUNDING BILL Ghost Hunters – Cert Denied Rob Zombie Class Action moves toward class certification Viacom/ YouTube case sees extraordinary order Grooveshark sued by UMG Sound Recording Copyright Terminations begin Who owns “La Dolce Vita” Does Eastland records have a 50/50 chance in court? [read post]
21 Nov 2011, 12:38 pm by Media Law Prof
Nirajan Man Singh, University of California, Berkeley, has published Viacom v. [read post]
18 Nov 2011, 4:00 pm by Ryan Radia
The Stop Online Piracy Act (SOPA), a controversial bill before the House of Representatives aimed at combating “rogue websites,” isn’t just about criminal, foreign-based sites that break U.S. intellectual property laws with impunity. [read post]
18 Nov 2011, 2:17 pm
The problem they seek to resolve arises from a line of cases, culminating in a federal district court's decision in Viacom International, Inc. v. [read post]
18 Nov 2011, 4:00 am by Terry Hart
YouTube, NMPA reach ‘unprecedented’ deal to pay independent music publishers — The terms of the settlement reached between Google and the National Music Publishers Association stemming from litigation related to the current lawsuit involving Viacom are now available. [read post]
17 Nov 2011, 3:39 pm by David Kravets
Let’s not forget that Viacom is suing YouTube for $1 billion, saying its business model will “completely destroy the value of many copyrighted creations.” And if you don’t believe the banks would willfully obey such an order from private rights holders without blinking an eye, consider WikiLeaks, which is nearly defunct because institutions like Bank of America, PayPal, MasterCard, Visa and others stopped processing donation payments to it. [read post]
16 Nov 2011, 2:19 pm by David Kravets
The copyright holder need only allege the site is “dedicated to infringing activity” — as say Viacom alleges about YouTube, and if the ad service or credit card company does not quickly sever ties, they can be held liable. [read post]
16 Nov 2011, 11:26 am by Steve Bainbridge
Instead, at Viacom’s direction, Harmonix negotiated a reduction in those fees for future years, after the earnout period ended. [read post]
15 Nov 2011, 8:16 pm by Eric
., the $100M+ that Google has spent fighting Viacom in the YouTube lawsuit--a huge amount of money that could have been instead invested in new services that benefit consumers, help rightsowners make more money and generally improve society. [read post]