Search for: "Virgin v. Virgin"
Results 681 - 700
of 1,038
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Jun 2011, 9:00 am
ARTICLE V (1) Extradition shall not be granted if: (a) the person sought would, if proceeded against in the territory of the requested Party for the offense for which his extradition is requested, be entitled to be discharged on the grounds of a previous acquittal or conviction in the territory of the requesting or requested Party or of a third State; or (b) the prosecution for the offense for which extradition is requested has become barred by lapse of time according to the law of the… [read post]
20 Jun 2011, 1:00 pm
ARTICLE V (1) Extradition shall not be granted if: (a) the person sought would, if proceeded against in the territory of the requested Party for the offense for which his extradition is requested, be entitled to be discharged on the grounds of a previous acquittal or conviction in the territory of the requesting or requested Party or of a third State; or (b) the prosecution for the offense for which extradition is requested has become barred by lapse of time according to the law of the… [read post]
10 Jun 2011, 9:00 am
ARTICLE V (1) Extradition shall not be granted if: (a) the person sought would, if proceeded against in the territory of the requested Party for the offense for which his extradition is requested, be entitled to be discharged on the grounds of a previous acquittal or conviction in the territory of the requesting or requested Party or of a third State; or (b) the prosecution for the offense for which extradition is requested has become barred by lapse of time according to the law of the… [read post]
8 Jun 2011, 2:39 am
Employees' Retirement System of the Government of the Virgin Islands v. [read post]
4 Jun 2011, 6:11 am
This is more or less virgin territory for the somewhat meagre existing jurisprudence on the constitutional freedom of association. [read post]
3 Jun 2011, 9:00 am
ARTICLE V (1) Extradition shall not be granted if: (a) the person sought would, if proceeded against in the territory of the requested Party for the offense for which his extradition is requested, be entitled to be discharged on the grounds of a previous acquittal or conviction in the territory of the requesting or requested Party or of a third State; or (b) the prosecution for the offense for which extradition is requested has become barred by lapse of time according to the law of the… [read post]
U.S. Supreme Court Holds "Willful Blindness" Suffices for Induced Infringement Knowledge Requirement
31 May 2011, 12:05 pm
., v. [read post]
29 May 2011, 5:52 am
Virgin Islands, and Air Force Lt. [read post]
26 May 2011, 8:00 pm
By John Ottaviani Barwick v. [read post]
25 May 2011, 6:50 pm
It is an appeal from the decision of the New South Wales Court of Appeal in Nicholls v Michael Wilson & Partners Ltd (2010) 243 FLR 177; [2010] NSWCA 222. [read post]
24 May 2011, 9:00 am
ARTICLE V (1) Extradition shall not be granted if: (a) the person sought would, if proceeded against in the territory of the requested Party for the offense for which his extradition is requested, be entitled to be discharged on the grounds of a previous acquittal or conviction in the territory of the requesting or requested Party or of a third State; or (b) the prosecution for the offense for which extradition is requested has become barred by lapse of time according to the law of the… [read post]
22 May 2011, 4:34 am
Judicial pronouncements on the subject are not on virgin ground. [read post]
13 May 2011, 9:00 am
ARTICLE V (1) Extradition shall not be granted if: (a) the person sought would, if proceeded against in the territory of the requested Party for the offense for which his extradition is requested, be entitled to be discharged on the grounds of a previous acquittal or conviction in the territory of the requesting or requested Party or of a third State; or (b) the prosecution for the offense for which extradition is requested has become barred by lapse of time according to the law of the… [read post]
13 May 2011, 6:07 am
’s iTunes, Amazon and Virgin, who promptly pulled the album from their shelves. [read post]
11 May 2011, 6:51 am
The criminal case is U.S. v. [read post]
10 May 2011, 3:46 pm
., v. [read post]
9 May 2011, 1:00 pm
ARTICLE V (1) Extradition shall not be granted if: (a) the person sought would, if proceeded against in the territory of the requested Party for the offense for which his extradition is requested, be entitled to be discharged on the grounds of a previous acquittal or conviction in the territory of the requesting or requested Party or of a third State; or (b) the prosecution for the offense for which extradition is requested has become barred by lapse of time according to the law of the… [read post]
2 May 2011, 4:55 am
Braun Melsungen AG, et. al. v. [read post]
2 May 2011, 3:18 am
Always anxious about how the small guys cope in battles against the big guys which, in his opinion, should never be fought, the IPKat was delighted to see the recent ruling in Virgin Enterprises Ltd v Casey [2011] EWHC 1036 (Ch), a ruling of Mr Justice Norris in the Chancery Division, England and Wales, on what the Kat has long considered the totally unmeritorious opposition lodged by Virgin Enterprises to an innocent and non-threatening trade mark… [read post]
29 Apr 2011, 6:09 pm
New York Social Security Ruling Underscores Importance of Treating Physician Testimony: Brown v. [read post]
