Search for: "WIFE v. v. HUSBAND V."
Results 681 - 700
of 6,700
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Apr 2011, 8:42 am
Yerushalmi v Yerushalmi 2011 NY Slip Op 02657 Decided on March 29, 2011 Appellate Division, Second Department The supreme court denied husband’s motion to modify a pendente lite support award to wife, and denied husband’s motion to renew, which husband appealed. [read post]
9 May 2017, 11:35 am
From the Appeals Court of Massachusetts decision last week in A.M.D. v. [read post]
8 Sep 2023, 4:10 am
In S.B.B. v. [read post]
15 Apr 2010, 8:58 am
Not in the case of Attiliis v. [read post]
12 Jun 2010, 12:12 pm
case=18302523943291676915&q=+Miller+v. [read post]
15 Dec 2011, 2:43 am
In short, the District Court reversed an award which obligated the Former Husband to pay future private school tuition and related expenses in a case where the Former Wife had not sought that relief, or any affirmative relief whatsoever. [read post]
30 Apr 2008, 9:10 am
The recording industry's music piracy fight was dealt a setback when a federal judge rejected the RIAA's "making available" argument in a lawsuit against a husband and wife accused of copyright infringement. [read post]
30 Jul 2009, 5:10 am
In an unpublished decision, the Michigan court of appeals voided a prenuptial agreement based upon findings that Husband had subjected Wife to years of mental and physical abuse. [read post]
29 Apr 2011, 12:12 pm
Matter of Krasnova v Krasnov 2011 NY Slip Op 03240 Decided on April 19, 2011 Appellate Division, Second Department The family court found that husband committed certain family offenses and ordered him to stay away from wife and the children for one year. [read post]
20 Mar 2012, 8:23 pm
After her husband’s death, Ms. [read post]
30 Sep 2018, 4:47 pm
He cites the case of Nestberg v. [read post]
14 Apr 2015, 4:18 pm
Moreover, although the wife argued against the husband's motion to return to the house, apparently it was not of major concern to her since she failed to cross-move for exclusive occupancy. [read post]
6 Jun 2014, 11:23 am
See Cunningham v. [read post]
14 May 2009, 9:34 pm
In the case, Gurevich v. [read post]
24 Jul 2020, 12:08 pm
Andrews v. [read post]
26 Jan 2014, 9:01 pm
Chace v. [read post]
5 Nov 2007, 6:57 am
It seems to me a straightforward enough decision, but Whig v Whig [2007] EWHC 1856 (Fam) deals with the much-feared situation of the husband making himself bankrupt just before the wife's ancillary relief (financial/property) claim is heard, apparently in order to defeat that claim. [read post]
1 Jul 2022, 12:25 pm
In Mishler v. [read post]
22 Apr 2008, 4:22 pm
In Delaney v Burgess the appellant de facto wife was able to show that the trial judge was incorrect in finding that her relationship with the de facto husband was only a business relationship of boarder and owner of the home, when amongst other things, they had had sex, he had described her affectionately in a card as his "wife", in children's proceedings had sworn that she was his de facto wife [read post]
22 Apr 2008, 4:22 pm
In Delaney v Burgess the appellant de facto wife was able to show that the trial judge was incorrect in finding that her relationship with the de facto husband was only a business relationship of boarder and owner of the home, when amongst other things, they had had sex, he had described her affectionately in a card as his "wife", in children's proceedings had sworn that she was his de facto wife [read post]
