Search for: "Washington Citizens Action of Washington v. State" Results 681 - 700 of 1,606
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Oct 2011, 6:33 am by Kali Borkoski
Today in the Community we are discussing Arizona v. [read post]
9 Jul 2019, 5:30 am by Guest Blogger
New York would seem to establish a point on a spectrum of deference to agencies’ stated rationales, opposite that of Hawaii v. [read post]
7 Sep 2013, 2:36 pm by Stephen Bilkis
The dispositive issue on appeal is whether there was probable cause, as a matter of law, to arrest plaintiff akin to Saunders v County of Washington. [read post]
31 Oct 2017, 10:20 am by Garrett Hinck
Kahn posted the government’s reply brief in ACLU v. [read post]
14 Feb 2019, 10:43 am by Christopher Porter, Klara Jordan
Sharing intelligence and information is a key element of NATO’s core decision-making process enshrined in Article 4 of the Washington Treaty. [read post]
15 Jan 2021, 8:01 am by Herb Lin, Amy Zegart
It should also be tasked with collecting and preserving information about this unprecedented event for future generations of policymakers, scholars and citizens. [read post]
8 Oct 2019, 4:07 am by Edith Roberts
” Briefly: At CNN, Ariane de Vogue reports that “[t]hree presidential electors in Washington state who voted for Colin Powell in 2016 rather than Hillary Clinton and were fined under state law are asking the US Supreme Court to take up their appeal and decide whether a state can bind an elector to vote for the state’s popular vote winner. [read post]
20 Feb 2007, 10:00 am
The Constitution, if it applies, does not depend upon the actions of the person, but rather upon the actions of the government, as Rasul states. [read post]
5 Jun 2014, 7:30 am by Katitza Rodriguez and Nadia Kayyali
In particular, the “Five Eyes”— The United States, New Zealand, Australia, the United Kingdom, and Canada— share citizen data amongst themselves - providing loopholes that might undermine national legislation. [read post]
5 Jun 2016, 9:01 pm by Ronald D. Rotunda
The Montana Supreme Court explicitly rejected Citizens United and refused to invalidate this state law. [read post]
25 Jul 2012, 5:49 pm
Morton signaled that legal action against Cook County may indeed be on the horizon – in which case action against Chicago might not be too far behind if it adopts Emanuel’s apparently similar proposed ordinance [read post]