Search for: "Washington v. Roberts" Results 681 - 700 of 4,445
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Mar 2010, 8:08 am by Erin Miller
The Seattle Post-Intelligencer reports that the State of Washington filed its brief yesterday in Doe #1 v. [read post]
23 Apr 2012, 6:19 am by Marissa Miller
Robert Barnes of the Washington Post discusses the difficulties lawyers face when making arguments based on legislative history to the Justices. [read post]
4 Mar 2010, 7:20 am by Erin Miller
” A Washington Post editorial yesterday concluded that the Court “rightly dismissed” Kiyemba v. [read post]
25 Jan 2010, 5:20 am by Matt Sundquist
The Washington Post reports on Friday's March For Life, an annual march marking the anniversary of the Roe v. [read post]
28 Nov 2016, 3:54 am by Edith Roberts
George Washington Law Review’s On the Docket previews all the cases in the December sitting. [read post]
17 May 2011, 9:47 am by Lovechilde
We know we have a tough and long road ahead in tackling our biggest challenge, namely overturning the "intent doctrine" as established in Washington v. [read post]
26 Jun 2019, 11:09 am by Vishnu Kannan
Circuit’s ruling in Qassim v. [read post]
10 Apr 2009, 4:21 pm
  In a one-sentence order (found here), the Circuit Court merely cited its Feb. 18 ruling in Kiyemba v. [read post]
23 Mar 2012, 4:01 pm by Colin O'Keefe
I promise I’m not trying to beat you over the head with Sackett v. [read post]
9 Jan 2008, 9:47 am
(To be sure, that didn't involve a state legislature, but one doubts that any of the justices in the conservative plurality would have changed one word of their opinion had it been the Washington or Kentucky legislature.) [read post]
5 Mar 2012, 6:55 am by Marissa Miller
The study’s author concludes that, among other differences, the Justices on the Roberts Court have spent more pre-appointment time in legal academia, appellate judging, and Washington, D.C. than any previous Court. [read post]
1 Feb 2021, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
Roberts’s invocation of stare decisis per Whole Woman’s Health v. [read post]