Search for: "We Don't Judge - We Defend"
Results 681 - 700
of 6,882
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Jun 2010, 11:52 am
In Los Angeles County, minors might be represented by public defenders or panel lawyers, who are paid on a flat rate and, critics say, don't have the same resources. [read post]
8 Feb 2010, 10:27 am
We don't have a dog in this hunt. [read post]
26 Jul 2007, 9:00 pm
Turn on your speakers, unless you don't want to hear expletives hurled about. [read post]
17 May 2007, 10:59 am
"The trouble is I don't understand the language," Judge Openshaw explained. [read post]
4 Aug 2010, 2:43 pm
We affirm. [read post]
8 Mar 2011, 3:00 am
Just because you don't like something doesn't mean there needs to be a law passed making it a crime; we already have enough laws on the books. [read post]
29 Oct 2018, 1:19 pm
It requires notice to defendants about what's going to be an issue at that hearing. [read post]
27 Jan 2009, 2:02 pm
If you're an attorney with the government -- here, with the California Attorney General's Office -- you clearly don't have a First Amendment right to represent whatever clients you want on the side. [read post]
2 May 2011, 6:17 am
For a moment, we could have sworn that the panel morphed into Pink Floyd singing "we don't need no education. [read post]
8 Mar 2019, 1:20 pm
But there are a thousand cases that we now don't know the rules for, right? [read post]
3 Apr 2023, 1:34 pm
All this money and attorney's fees wasted by the state on something that accomplishes essentially -- probably, literally -- nothing.I can't believe we don't have better things to do with our time.Anyway, the case gets remanded back to Judge Mendez. [read post]
10 Jul 2008, 7:49 pm
I don't mean to generalize so broadly, but we make martyrs of ourselves on a fairly regular basis in the name of protecting our clients... [read post]
8 Dec 2008, 9:58 pm
By the end, Zauzmer, Cogan and Jacobs' closings will all reference facts that at least some jurors don't remember or remember differently. [read post]
8 Dec 2008, 9:58 pm
By the end, Zauzmer, Cogan and Jacobs' closings will all reference facts that at least some jurors don't remember or remember differently. [read post]
23 Mar 2007, 2:04 pm
But sometimes, such decisions, were they published, could prove quite useful elsewhere, but being unpublished probably can't be cited under court rules, and because they are by a trial judge, don't have any more than persuasive precedential value in any event. [read post]
31 May 2016, 8:36 pm
Even if our data isn’t technically “secret,” (because we have intentionally or unintentionally shared it with someone or something else), this doesn’t mean we don’t think this information should be kept private from the prying eyes of the government. [read post]
10 Nov 2011, 12:30 pm
Since the sides are now flipped.It's not that I don't understand the practicalities. [read post]
22 Oct 2019, 8:37 pm
Judge Davis chuckled and asked, "Don't you work for me? [read post]
20 Apr 2020, 2:51 pm
You don't lose all your rights just because you've committed a criminal offense. [read post]
28 Apr 2014, 1:33 pm
Vargo added "I don't ever want to cause anyone any pain ever again and I want to make amends any and every way possible. [read post]
