Search for: "Wells v. CIR"
Results 681 - 700
of 14,545
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Nov 2007, 12:58 pm
CIR Commissioner of Internal RevenueCOOK, Circuit Judge. [read post]
21 May 2021, 1:41 pm
. -- and discusses them well. [read post]
9 May 2018, 12:15 pm
And when you're already in the triple digit page numbers and you've still got twenty-some single-spaced pages to read; well, you're pretty much exhausted.Not surprisingly, the opinion's very comprehensive. [read post]
20 Jan 2015, 3:12 pm
But here you go.As is usual with my speculation, I may well be entirely off base. [read post]
23 May 2022, 1:04 pm
Incredibly smart -- and stunningly nice -- guy.But from running a program designed to protect the constitutional rights of indigent criminal defendants to advocating on behalf of a company that's using an Indian front company to make usurious loans to indigent and working-class individuals -- well, at a minimum, that's quite a pivot, no? [read post]
2 Nov 2015, 10:34 am
In which a guy in Nevada in 2009 gets deported, but a guy in Nevada in 2013 who does the exact same thing does not, and a guy in (say) Kansas in either year stays as well. [read post]
28 Aug 2023, 10:35 am
The stark reality is that the nature of the crimes, as well as the number of children involved, isn't exactly conducive to wanting to reach out and reverse his convictions.Now, the sentence imposed on the guy here -- Michael Pepe -- is an extraordinarily long one: 210 years. [read post]
6 Dec 2021, 2:18 pm
Members of this Court not among today’s dissenters have volunteered for service in the active military or the National Guard (the modern “well regulated Militia”) and bore arms during that service. [read post]
15 Jun 2016, 10:26 am
So right that it doesn't need oral argument, nor more than a week after the date the case was deemed submitted to publish its opinion.It may well be (and in fact is the case) that, in California state court, when the trial judge grants an anti-SLAPP motion that dismisses the claims against two of three defendants, that order is subject to an immediate appeal. [read post]
7 Feb 2014, 5:00 pm
Attorney might explain a portion as well.I'm sure there are innumerable other relevant factors in play as well. [read post]
20 Dec 2013, 3:41 pm
Judge Reinhardt's right.Personally, I think the defendant knew full well what she was getting into. [read post]
9 Jul 2013, 12:22 pm
As well as to Judge McKeown. [read post]
24 Apr 2014, 11:45 am
One of the great things about reading appellate opinions is that you often see things you've never, ever seen before.Like in this one.I've read plenty of cases involving custodial (as well as non-custodial) interrogations. [read post]
22 Jul 2020, 1:46 pm
., pointing towards the gap) was 17 miles per hour.The oral argument in this case was on March 31, 2020; admittedly before the killing of George Floyd, but the resulting uproar about police tactics might well have led the plaintiffs to think: "Hey, given the facts, we've got a real chance at winning here, right? [read post]
3 Jun 2019, 4:29 pm
The petitioner here says that the U.S. authorizing statute -- which post-dated both the treaty as well as the Supreme Court's holding -- is unconstitutional, since it wasn't approved by the Senate in the manner required by a treaty. [read post]
5 Aug 2013, 1:38 pm
I would have thought it went without saying, but then again, I would have thought that about the preceding two points as well. [read post]
2 May 2014, 11:23 am
They pose the question whether the government may target poor, minority neighborhoods and seek to tempt their residents to commit crimes that might well result in their escape from poverty. [read post]
18 Sep 2014, 12:21 pm
As well as a profoundly serious one. [read post]
18 Jun 2019, 2:49 pm
As well as diminishing whatever residual sympathy a Ninth Circuit panel might have for the petitioner. [read post]
15 Jun 2017, 11:00 am
That may well be illegal.But it's only illegal if it's willful, and, geeze, I'm just at a total loss to explain to a nonlawyer -- or even a lawyer! [read post]
