Search for: "Will v. Commissioner of Social Security"
Results 681 - 700
of 1,046
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
31 Dec 2013, 5:38 am
This IMMI goes jointly to the Supreme Court for invalidating most of DOMA (the Defense of Marriage Act) in U.S. v. [read post]
30 Dec 2013, 8:38 am
This IMMI goes jointly to the Supreme Court for invalidating most of DOMA (the Defense of Marriage Act) in U.S. v. [read post]
19 Dec 2013, 7:07 am
Alberta (Information and Privacy Commissioner) v. [read post]
5 Dec 2013, 1:52 pm
Commissioner (1989), relying on United States v. [read post]
5 Dec 2013, 10:08 am
Commissioner (1989). [read post]
2 Dec 2013, 11:14 pm
In Lee, Amish employers claimed that it was against their religion to contribute money to the social security system (or to get social security benefits). [read post]
1 Dec 2013, 5:30 am
U-HAUL CO. v. [read post]
22 Nov 2013, 2:43 pm
Google’s Forum-Selection Clause Upheld AgainRudgayzer v. [read post]
22 Nov 2013, 12:00 am
Comm’r, 65 T.C. 1014, 1019 (1976) (denying a teacher’s aid with an undergraduate degree in social work to deduct the expense of a doctorate degree in social work, since the Ph.D. degree obtained was the minimum amount of education normally required for the employment secured as a full-time permanent faculty member). [read post]
17 Nov 2013, 5:30 am
http://t.co/TWdAOrAlln -> Social Worker’s Facebook Rant Justified Termination — Shepherd v. [read post]
14 Nov 2013, 1:04 pm
Simon.Stahl, Philip Michael.Chicago, Illinois : ABA Section of Family Law, [2013]KF547 .S733 2013 Family Law According to our hearts : Rhinelander v. [read post]
8 Nov 2013, 1:19 pm
My blog for @CenDemTech about why this is v. worrisome. https://www.cdt.org/blogs/gs-hans/0611overbroad-subpoena-airbnb-user-data-smacks-general-warrant … “Does the U.S. [read post]
27 Oct 2013, 5:30 am
Wallis, MD Florida 2013http://t.co/7psHtlPOaz -> TRO granted to prevent open sourcing of infringing software BATTELLE ENERGY v SOUTHFORK SECURITY Idaho 2013http://t.co/b68D3Uw6mY -> Hosting agreement terminated for customer spamming AHOSTING, INC. v. [read post]
24 Oct 2013, 9:01 pm
Georgia and McClesky v. [read post]
22 Oct 2013, 10:34 am
Available from: www.ohchr.org/EN/Issues/Business/Forum/Pages/2012ForumonBusinessandHumanRights.aspx Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights (f) See the link of the Office of the High Commissioner (OHCHR) to tools on business and human rights, including the publication containing the text of the Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights and The Corporate Responsibility to Respect Human Rights: An Interpretive Guide,… [read post]
29 Sep 2013, 5:30 am
Becomes Canada’s Longest-Serving Chief Justice http://t.co/WxpKIS9o3n -> Life on the Social Media Front Line: The legal and ethical challenges facing Online Community Managers http://t.co/YD8WpEJJZj -> eBay Not Liable for Technical Glitch When Seller Doesn't Set Reserve Price — D'Agostino v. eBay http://t.co/2epESgQmu0 -> Court Upholds Doocing For Snarky Facebook Post — Rodriquez v. [read post]
27 Sep 2013, 5:54 am
. caused by a qualifying World Trade Center condition" as defined in the Retirement and Social Security Law, "shall be presumptive evidence that it was incurred in the performance and discharge of duty and the natural and proximate result of an accident . [read post]
23 Sep 2013, 11:27 am
District Court for the District of Minnesota under the caption Kiminski, et al v. [read post]
22 Sep 2013, 5:30 am
FILMON X LLC, Dist. of Columbia 2013http://t.co/7azXy5rkKn -> Sarah Palin sued for copyright infringement by New Jersey publisher http://t.co/ojxzcyzaA6 -> VIACOM V YOUTUBE POSTSCRIPT—COPYRIGHT INFRINGEMENT, SOCIAL MEDIA AND THE BLURRED LINES OF DMCA SAFE HARBORS http://t.co/RIeACFKyd9 -> Divided CAFC Finds Computer System Claims Patent Ineligiblehttp://t.co/4fmEdo5ULn -> Collective Copyright Trolling? [read post]
20 Sep 2013, 6:00 am
With regard to the Privacy Commissioner’s findings, the use of video surveillance and GPS is generally not permitted for productivity management although it may be permitted if the employer can show a bona fide safety or security reason for the surveillance. [read post]
