Search for: "Williams v. AT&T Services, Inc." Results 681 - 700 of 834
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Aug 2008, 1:25 pm
– Discussion of IPFrontline.com article ‘Understanding Intellectual Property Value’: (IP finance), How to make sure your IP strategy plan is not doomed to failure: (IP Asset Maximizer Blog) Improve venture capital returns with IP portfolio management: (Ezine @rticles)   Global - Trade Marks / Domain Names / Brands Trade mark strategy – counterintuitive names: (IP Thinktank), ICANN Intellectual Property Constituency paper on sunrise mechanisms for… [read post]
4 Oct 2011, 3:28 pm by Steve Bainbridge
Back when I was a summer associate at White & Case, we used to talk about SEC v. [read post]
1 Jun 2010, 8:16 am by law shucks
Round Rock is the second-largest owner of patents among so- called nonpracticing entities, or companies that don’t sell the technology or services for which they hold patents, according to PatentFreedom, a group that keeps a database of patent holdings. [read post]
29 Oct 2007, 1:08 am
Since she doesn't use squads of associates and paralegals in her work Patrick can provide her clients the same expertise she did at a big firm with lower overhead and more responsive service. [read post]
25 Mar 2020, 6:03 pm by Eugene Volokh
Connecticut Ass'n of Schools, Inc.; I expect there'll be a response to it filed, and I'll be glad to blog that as well: [A.] [read post]
30 Jan 2024, 9:02 pm by renholding
The Commission devoted significant resources to evaluating its enforcement program in 1972.[9]  In January 1972, Chairman William Casey created a three-member committee to “examine the SEC’s enforcement policy and practices, engage in frequent dialogue with the members of the Commission and with our staff, seek and sift the suggestions of the bar and make recommendations to the Commission for worthwhile improvements to our time-honored ways. [read post]
29 Aug 2018, 7:03 am by Dan Carvajal
Wayfair that South Dakota can require collection of its sales tax on sales to its residents by out-of-state internet retailers.[2] The 5 to 4 decision overruled two earlier precedents, National Bellas Hess, Inc. v. [read post]