Search for: "York v. South Carolina" Results 681 - 700 of 930
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Aug 2011, 10:06 am by Roshonda Scipio
(RES) TZ 2 SP33 2011 Civil Rights With all deliberate speed : implementing Brown v. [read post]
1 Aug 2011, 6:03 am by Stephen Albainy-Jenei
The Volokh Conspiracy outlines the case of a woman being prosecuted for displaying plastic testicles on her car because South Carolina bans obscene or indecent bumper stickers and similar “device[s]. [read post]
23 Jul 2011, 5:00 am by Gregory Dell
Sun Life and Health Insurance Company et. al) and the other in the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, Spartanburg Division (Duane Easler v. [read post]
22 Jul 2011, 6:39 am by mmoreland
Following New York Times Co. v. [read post]
14 Jul 2011, 9:23 am by rbm3
TRADE Washington, D.C. : Inside Washington Publishers, c1983- See Catalog Commercial policy -- Environmental aspects -- Case studies TRADE AND THE ENVIRONMENT : LAW AND POLICY / CHRIS WOLD, SANFORD GAINES, GREG BLOCK Durham, N.C. : Carolina Academic Press, c2005 K3943 .W648 2005 See Catalog Common law -- United States -- History COMMON LAW, HISTORY, AND DEMOCRACY IN AMERICA, 1790-1900 / KUNAL M. [read post]
13 Jul 2011, 11:49 am by rbm3
TRADE Washington, D.C. : Inside Washington Publishers, c1983- See Catalog Commercial policy -- Environmental aspects -- Case studies TRADE AND THE ENVIRONMENT : LAW AND POLICY / CHRIS WOLD, SANFORD GAINES, GREG BLOCK Durham, N.C. : Carolina Academic Press, c2005 K3943 .W648 2005 See Catalog Common law -- United States -- History COMMON LAW, HISTORY, AND DEMOCRACY IN AMERICA, 1790-1900 / KUNAL M. [read post]
5 Jul 2011, 5:41 am by Bill Merkel
Dicey (legislative omnipotence), Thomas Jefferson (departmentalism and active popular sovereignty that does not go dormant in non-Ackermanian moments), James Madison (a system of checks and balances reduced to a short code), or John Marshall (judicial supremacy based on an instrument that did not say a word about judicial supremacy when he wrote Marbury and continued silent on that point when his successors affixed each of their signatures to Aaron v. [read post]
4 Jul 2011, 9:04 am by Susan I. Nelson
New laws in Georgia, Alabama and South Carolina are following — and in some ways outdoing — Arizona’s attempt to engineer the mass expulsion of the undocumented, no matter the damage to the Constitution, public safety, local economies and immigrant families. [read post]
21 Jun 2011, 10:58 am by Lawrence Solum
South Carolina Coastal Council, 505 U.S. 1003 (1992), these lectures are not lectures in American constitutional law, nor do they aim to build pathways through the swamp of US takings jurisprudence Highly recommended. [read post]
12 Jun 2011, 4:02 pm by Peter Tillers
Chadbourn is in danger of being deleted or radically pruned, I will reproduce that entry here: James Harmon Chadbourn (born Spartanburg, South Carolina, 1905; died, Cambridge, Massachusetts, 1982) was an American legal scholar and an expert in civil procedure, Federal jurisdiction and evidence.[1][2]  He was a Fessenden Professor of law at Harvard University from 1963 until his retirement in 1974.[2] Education   Chadbourn received a B.A. from The… [read post]
12 Jun 2011, 7:22 am by Jonathan H. Adler
The complaint claims that ChicoBag’s advertising and promotional materials violate the federal Lanham Act and the South Carolina Unfair Trade Practices Act. [read post]
6 Jun 2011, 6:12 am by Brian A. Comer
J&J’s 4.95 percent bonds due in 2033 fell 1.36 percent to 102.3 cents on the dollar, according to Trace, the bond-price reporting system of the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority.The case is State of South Carolina v. [read post]
27 May 2011, 7:32 am by Dan Markel
Farber (Northeastern University) Privacy in the Workplace: City of Ontario v Quon *Clifford S Fishman (Catholic University of America) Consent-To-Search and Dignity *Josephine Ross (Howard University) Abstract: This country is at a crossroads regarding privacy. [read post]
26 May 2011, 6:00 am by Victoria VanBuren
 There is nothing in the Federal Arbitration Act that precludes either of these determinations by the Supreme Court of South Carolina”) (citations omitted);  see also id. at 452-53 (Breyer, J.) [read post]