Search for: "Bills v. State" Results 6981 - 7000 of 21,856
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Dec 2017, 1:39 pm by Wolfgang Demino
_______________________NATIONAL COLLEGIATE STUDENT                          IN THE COURT AT LAW LOAN TRUST A DELAWARE STATUTORY TRUST                                      PLAINTIFF                       … [read post]
5 Jul 2016, 3:00 am by Amy Howe
” Commentary on last week’s decision in McDonnell v. [read post]
10 May 2017, 3:30 am by Barry Sookman
They may only charge their costs  for disclosing this information, costs that the Court stated were likely to be negligible. [read post]
24 Mar 2011, 11:03 am by Layla Kuhl
In Billings v Michigan Ability Partners, the Court reversed the part of the Court of Appeals decision that reinstated the plaintiff’s claim of discrimination under the Persons with Disabilities Civil Rights Act. [read post]
14 Mar 2013, 7:57 pm by John W. Arden
The third factor—whether the regulation intruded on legislative debate—was satisfied by the City Council’s rejection of three resolutions specifically targeting sugar sweetened beverages and the state legislature’s failure to pass three bills on the subject. [read post]
31 Jan 2013, 10:14 am
She one time stated that "Middle Easterners are lazy" and complained to a co-worker when "another one" was hired. [read post]
24 Mar 2023, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
The court then explained that an "appointment of an individual from a constitutionally valid expired list violates Article V, §6 of the NY Constitution" citing Matter of City of New York v New York State Div. of Human Rights, 93 NY2d 768.* Nevertheless, in light of the conditional offer of employment given to Plaintiff, and his request for back pay, the Appellate Division denied the Respondents' request that the Appellate Division dismiss… [read post]
24 Mar 2023, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
The court then explained that an "appointment of an individual from a constitutionally valid expired list violates Article V, §6 of the NY Constitution" citing Matter of City of New York v New York State Div. of Human Rights, 93 NY2d 768.* Nevertheless, in light of the conditional offer of employment given to Plaintiff, and his request for back pay, the Appellate Division denied the Respondents' request that the Appellate Division dismiss… [read post]