Search for: "Child v. Child"
Results 6981 - 7000
of 30,421
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Jun 2011, 11:44 am
Today, a divided United States Supreme Court ruled that police should have considered a 13-year-old robbery suspect's age when he was questioned in J.D.B. v. [read post]
31 Mar 2010, 7:02 am
Bay Shore v. [read post]
26 Feb 2008, 6:59 am
United States v. [read post]
10 Mar 2010, 5:55 am
DYFS v. [read post]
7 Aug 2013, 9:31 pm
The case is captioned, Klever Belisario Miranda v. [read post]
13 Oct 2021, 5:11 am
Blackwell v. [read post]
18 Jul 2012, 3:34 am
Leach v Office of Communications: [2012] EWCA Civ 959; [2012] WLR (D) 205 “The trust placed by an employer in an employee was at the core of their relationship. [read post]
2 Jul 2012, 5:43 pm
Kimock v. [read post]
4 Jan 2012, 12:18 pm
She's likely to lose her third child no matter what we do. [read post]
27 Jan 2008, 11:28 pm
See Scott v. [read post]
28 Sep 2014, 7:28 pm
(Gersten v. [read post]
10 Sep 2022, 7:31 am
[Germany][Petition granted][Grave risk of Harm][Ameliorative measures] In Radu, v. [read post]
11 Jun 2008, 9:45 pm
The most recent Supreme Court ruling was Ashcroft v. [read post]
20 May 2011, 9:03 am
Huffman v Huffman 2011 NY Slip Op 04001 Decided on May 10, 2011 Appellate Division, Second Department The supreme court awarded wife, in the parties’ divorce, 30% of the value of husband’s Master’s Degree, weekly child support of $1,281.14, maintenance for 4 years from December 2008, consisting of $5,000 per month for two years and $3,500 and $2,000 per month for years three and four respectively, and an award of $90,793.02 in connection with certain bonus money. [read post]
13 May 2019, 3:46 pm
(Ruffolo v. [read post]
16 Jan 2007, 10:30 am
In Fajardo v. [read post]
21 Apr 2005, 4:49 pm
In United States v. [read post]
9 Oct 2009, 12:44 pm
Shawn Minihan won in State v. [read post]
30 Apr 2011, 10:05 am
Sometimes, however, a parent’s right to know can supersede the child’s privacy rights, as illustrated in the recent New Jersey case of Van Brunt v. [read post]
16 Sep 2014, 12:39 pm
Under the circumstances presented, A's conduct in returning to New York was not unjustifiable based on Domestic Relations Law § 76-g[1][b], Sanjuan v Sanjuan and the Uniform Child Custody Jurisdiction and Enforcement Act [1997] § 208. [read post]
