Search for: "English v. English"
Results 6981 - 7000
of 11,204
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Sep 2012, 8:45 am
The Supreme Court of the United States issued the seminal decision interpreting the provisions of the IDEA in the case of Board of Education of Hendrick Hudson Bd. of Ed. v. [read post]
17 Sep 2012, 1:24 am
In any event, the Court of Appeal stated that Andrew Smith J's decision was plainly correct and that a single arbitrator should have been appointed.This case highlights the consistent approach of the English courts in seeking to minimise appeals arising from arbitrations under the Act. [read post]
16 Sep 2012, 7:45 am
In Seong Yun Ko v. [read post]
16 Sep 2012, 7:36 am
In Ko v. [read post]
14 Sep 2012, 4:03 pm
Horvath, an Hungarian citizen was interrogated in Dutch and English by Dutch speaking police officers of the Ghent police without the assistance of a sworn interpreter (art.47 bis of the code of criminal instruction). [read post]
14 Sep 2012, 3:22 am
Amidst a raft of judgments and opinions handed down by the CJEU on 6 September 2012, are several of note which relate to the EU private international law instruments, as follows: Brussels I Regulation Judgment: Case C-619/10, Trade Agency Ltd v Seramico Investments – application of Arts. 34(1) and (2) to the enforcement of an English default judgment, including an assessment as to whether the enforcement of a judgment given in default of appearance, without reasons, may… [read post]
14 Sep 2012, 3:00 am
The case of the day is Box v. [read post]
13 Sep 2012, 7:45 pm
It has long been a principle of English law that someone should not have the benefit of unjust enrichment. [read post]
13 Sep 2012, 7:28 pm
The seminal Florida case defining the dangerous instrumentality doctrine is Southern Cotton Oil Co. v. [read post]
13 Sep 2012, 3:18 pm
In the first case, EMI (IP) Ltd v British Sky Broadcasting Group plc [2012] EWHC 1644 (Ch), noted by the IPKat here, the facts were as follows. [read post]
13 Sep 2012, 8:28 am
Lewin of McCarter & English, New York, told BNA. [read post]
13 Sep 2012, 7:45 am
For instance, according to the English case Payne v. [read post]
13 Sep 2012, 6:54 am
In the first case, EMI (IP) Ltd v British Sky Broadcasting Group plc [2012] EWHC 1644 (Ch), noted by the IPKat here, the facts were as follows. [read post]
13 Sep 2012, 1:45 am
Frank Sinatra Enterprises, LLC v. [read post]
12 Sep 2012, 9:30 am
Fisher v. [read post]
11 Sep 2012, 9:28 pm
(FN: McBoyle v. [read post]
11 Sep 2012, 12:57 am
"Harley Lewin (McCarter & English) for Louboutin stated that they considered the decision to be "a significant win, not only for Louboutin, but for the fashion industry in general". [read post]
10 Sep 2012, 11:32 pm
In Whitehouse v Gay News Limited [1979] AC 617, the matter was debated in the House of Lords. [read post]
10 Sep 2012, 9:06 pm
(Indeed, earlier English governments had done just that.) [read post]
10 Sep 2012, 7:06 am
(Eugene Volokh) From the Norwood v. [read post]
