Search for: "IN RE OFFICIAL PUBLICATION OF DECISIONS"
Results 6981 - 7000
of 7,456
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Aug 2008, 1:50 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Thinktank Global week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com] Highlights this week included: The end of William Patry’s blog: (Patry Copyright Blog), (Excess Copyright), (Patently-O), (Chicago IP Litigation Blog), (Michael Geist), (The Fire of Genius), (Techdirt), (Patry Copyright Blog), Kitchin J clarifies scope of biotech patents, in particular gene sequence patents: Eli Lilly & Co v Human Genome Sciences: (Managing… [read post]
6 Aug 2008, 12:26 am
The case in Cherry Hill was combined with a challenge in Galloway Township, where officials are reportedly appealing the decision as well. [read post]
5 Aug 2008, 3:10 pm
"We're hopeful the Supreme Court will agree with the Appellate Court and deny the petition. [read post]
4 Aug 2008, 7:24 pm
One more goal was to show the public that "law" impacts much of what we do and is not limited to court decisions or statute books. [read post]
4 Aug 2008, 7:06 pm
Wecht, No. 07-4767 In a trial accusing a public official of misusing his office for private financial gain, an order to withhold from the public the names and addresses of prospective and trial jurors is vacated where: 1) the collateral order doctrine granted jurisdiction to hear the appeal; 2) intervenors-media companies had standing to challenge the order; 3) there is a presumptive First Amendment right to obtain the names of jurors prior to empanelment, which was not… [read post]
4 Aug 2008, 6:17 pm
Wecht, No. 07-4767 "In a trial accusing a public official of misusing his office for private financial gain, an order to withhold from the public the names and addresses of prospective and trial jurors is vacated where: 1) the collateral order doctrine granted jurisdiction to hear the appeal; 2) intervenors-media companies had standing to challenge the order; 3) there is a presumptive First Amendment right to obtain the names of jurors prior to empanelment, which was… [read post]
3 Aug 2008, 6:57 am
Smith and attended by top county officials. [read post]
2 Aug 2008, 12:54 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Thinktank Global week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com] Highlights this week included: Discussion and analysis of WTO Ministerial meeting progress on TRIPs issues: (Intellectual Property Watch), (Intellectual Property Watch), (Intellectual Property Watch), (Intellectual Property Watch), (Intellectual Property Watch), (Intellectual Property Watch), (IP Updates), Italian broadcaster, Mediaset sues Google for hosting video clips on… [read post]
1 Aug 2008, 11:40 pm
That's a sizeable force to help us in this struggle. - Well you need to re-examine the sex offender laws, which are not, and will not work. [read post]
31 Jul 2008, 5:30 pm
Conversely, we know of at least seven instances where we took affirmative steps to ensure that favorable drug preemption decisions did make it on to the services (and, in two cases, got officially reported). [read post]
30 Jul 2008, 8:02 pm
As with those previous decisions, the DOJ is expected to seek review by the Supreme Court. [read post]
30 Jul 2008, 7:33 am
And the decision about where a sex offender should live properly resides with law enforcement agencies. [read post]
30 Jul 2008, 12:13 am
" Citing In re Silenus Wines, 557 F.2d 806 (CCPA 1977). [read post]
29 Jul 2008, 10:28 am
Letter to Governor Riley, 7-29-08, sent via email through his official website: Subject: Prison and Paroles Re: Mr. [read post]
27 Jul 2008, 3:27 pm
ALITO, J., took no part in the consideration or decision of the case....] [read post]
26 Jul 2008, 6:37 pm
At issue in this case is whether the district court properly denied qualified immunity to the officials. [read post]
25 Jul 2008, 4:45 pm
They're not happy because the word easy is still in the name". [read post]
25 Jul 2008, 9:13 am
County officials are planning a listening session for an evening next week to gather public opinion on the matter, Kahrs said. [read post]
24 Jul 2008, 8:40 pm
" New York Times, July 21; TechNewsWorld, July 22 WebAnywhere overcomes visual impairments "Blind persons generally use computers with the help of screen-reader software, but those products can cost more than $1,000, so they're not exactly common on public computers at libraries. [read post]
21 Jul 2008, 9:14 pm
"Findlaw summaries [may] include opoinions that have not yet been released for publication and may be subject to modification, correction or withdrawl U.S. 1st Circuit Court of Appeals, July 14, 2008 US v. [read post]
