Search for: "In Interest of Doe"
Results 6981 - 7000
of 135,104
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Jul 2010, 2:26 pm
by Steve Gardner The Center for Science in the Public Interest, working with private plaintiff firms Reese Richman, LLP and Whatley Drake & Kallas, were pleased to get a very well-considered opinion in our lawsuit against Coke involving vitaminwater (Coke uses the lower case, as does the Court, so I grudgingly do as well). [read post]
15 Jul 2016, 4:10 am
The United States produced evidence that the Department is not screening out insincere applicants or enforcing the rules of participation in the program, and the Secretary does not contest that evidence. [read post]
18 Jan 2018, 2:25 pm
This one is about usury and permissible interest rates (in particular, compound interest).I assume the California Supreme Court will take the thing and decide it. [read post]
21 Oct 2015, 3:16 pm
Interesting article on restrictions on flying the American flag in Utah. [read post]
26 Jan 2023, 8:36 am
And I know my lawyers are the most interesting people in the room. ... [read post]
14 Jan 2013, 7:41 am
The question discussed amongst the legal community is “What effect does this purchase have on the Kim Kardashian and Kris Humphries divorce? [read post]
26 Jul 2015, 11:26 am
Where one of the spouses dies, the entire interest in the property automatically passes to the surviving joint owner who becomes full owner. [read post]
13 Dec 2020, 11:13 am
Wisconsin Election Commission does not include Mr. [read post]
25 Jan 2018, 4:15 am
Apple’s motion demonstrates that PTAB does not publish ex parte communications into the administrative record as required by the APA, which is the exact issue Saint Regis requested discovery on and was denied... [read post]
21 May 2016, 2:51 am
., May 12, 2016) (affirming summary judgment in favor of the hospital on Winger's liberty interest claim, but reversing as to Winger's property interest claim in continued employment)Discrimination/Retaliation *Glapion v. [read post]
20 Mar 2025, 4:10 am
The EEOC argues these alternatives are not feasible because the PWFA does not give it authority to predetermine religious exemptions or defenses. [read post]
30 Jul 2014, 5:30 am
Comparing Colorado and California may be complicated by population, localized values and interest, as well as other variables, but it does help to predict what the pot market could look like in the state if marijuana becomes legalized. [read post]
24 Jul 2013, 9:34 am
As noted in the article -- and is typical in these situations -- the July 10 adoption of the resolution of necessity does not mean that the City will now stop negotiating with property owners. [read post]
17 Feb 2011, 5:51 am
The bill stops short of implementing and recommending an actual schedule but does utilize guidelines for a Court to look to for setting visitation. [read post]
18 Feb 2015, 12:54 pm
Even when faced with a child who does not want to return to the home of your ex-spouse, it is important to note that failure to follow court-ordered dates for returning a child to Florida from outside the state (or country) can have damaging impacts on your custody rights. [read post]
2 Jan 2013, 6:51 am
That Mobilicity offers customers wireless services with “no contracts” (when Mobilicity does in fact require contracts); and 3. [read post]
29 Jan 2017, 7:00 am
Second, the decision served the Town’s important governmental interests in aesthetics and traffic safety in a manner that was narrowly tailored to serve those interests. [read post]
9 Feb 2014, 4:41 am
The basis upon which lenders such as Paragon, should the join, will make a decision as to who remains on their panel and who does not remains a closely guarded secret. [read post]
9 Jul 2013, 9:00 am
The law itself does very little to alter the landscape, but most intriguing is what the legislature rejected. [read post]
7 Apr 2014, 4:29 am
Under Central Hudson, does the government’s interest in halting false commercial speech—which is both unprotected and potentially highly damaging to consumers and competitors—justify the resulting burden on truthful commercial speech? [read post]
