Search for: "Labelle v. State" Results 6981 - 7000 of 8,032
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
It rejected the Council’s claim that the County improperly piecemealed the CEQA analyses for each amendment, because, as stated in Banning Ranch Conservancy v. [read post]
7 Mar 2021, 9:01 pm by Sherry F. Colb
Under the (perhaps largely defunct) “Lemon test” from Lemon v. [read post]
3 Feb 2008, 10:20 pm
Rev. 481, 481 (2005), stating that the issue has been labeled an "Armageddon" by some and a "salvation" by others. [read post]
7 Mar 2023, 7:14 am by Alan J. Arville
However, such prescribing activities would be limited under the new rules to non-narcotic Schedule III-V controlled substances, a limitation not expressly included in the special registration provisions of the Ryan Haight Act. [read post]
14 Nov 2008, 2:10 am
(IPKat)   United States An innovation agenda for the new administration (EFF) 10 years of the DMCA: (Part 8 – Public Knowledge) (Safe harbour provisions - Public Knowledge) (Trailer – Public Knowledge) Why US website owners should watch foreign suits (Law360) Copyright Alliance begs Supreme Court to make remote DVRs illegal (Techdirt) First Amendment bars trade mark infringement claims regarding fictionalised ‘Pig Pen’ strip club in game… [read post]
21 Nov 2008, 12:13 pm
You can separately subscribe to the Online edition of the IP Think Tank Global Week in Review by subscribing by email, or selecting 'all posts' or 'IP on the net' at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com]   Highlights this week included: Australia: Hollywood studios commence proceedings in the Federal Court against Australian ISP, iiNet, over BitTorrent piracy (TorrentFreak) (LawFont) (Recording Industry vs The People) (Techdirt) US: Judge allows Jones Day hyperlink… [read post]
17 Oct 2011, 5:58 am by Steve McConnell
Professor William Hubbard, in "The Problem of Measuring Legal Change, with Application to Bell Atlantic v. [read post]
8 Jul 2011, 11:22 am by Orin Kerr
United States, was about the scope of the exclusionary rule. [read post]