Search for: "MATTER OF A R"
Results 6981 - 7000
of 114,124
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Oct 2020, 6:11 pm
Why should that matter? [read post]
18 Oct 2020, 2:42 pm
Players:Decision by Judge Bress, joined by Judge R. [read post]
18 Oct 2020, 12:11 pm
The matter of trust came up last week in an item on the California Stem Cell Report that dealt with the Proposition 14 campaign and how hype can erode the people's faith in science.The following comment was sent via email by a person very well-versed in science, research and human behavior who, however, must remain anonymous. [read post]
18 Oct 2020, 11:31 am
Thus, in any case where it matters which opinion has the narrower view, the dissent's approach would have us set aside the narrower opinion's points of disagreement as dictum, and the application of Marks would fail to provide a governing rule of law. [read post]
18 Oct 2020, 10:55 am
In 2020, the diorama was removed from view in response to the Black Lives Matter movement.... [read post]
17 Oct 2020, 3:35 pm
R. [read post]
17 Oct 2020, 7:27 am
We will constantly be challenging the various misconceptions the West has about law in China, including that the law in China does not really matter or that guanxi can supplant it. [read post]
17 Oct 2020, 5:01 am
§ 609.765, subd. 2 (2018) ("Whoever with knowledge of its false and defamatory character … communicates any false and defamatory matter to a third person … is guilty of criminal defamation …. [read post]
17 Oct 2020, 4:28 am
That power isn’t new, of course, but for a long time, its practical effect was mostly a matter of focus, or at worst, as social psychologist Jonathan Haidt puts it, asking 'Can I believe it? [read post]
17 Oct 2020, 3:11 am
’ (Andrea Saccucci, University of Campania); ‘The Role of the European Court of Human Rights in the Development of Rules on Universal Civil Jurisdiction – Naït-Liman v Switzerland in the Transition between the Chamber and the Grand Chamber’ (Serena Forlati, University of Ferrara); ‘The Interpretation of the European Convention on Human Rights – Lessons from the Naït-Liman Case’ (Malgosia Fitzmaurice, Queen Mary University); … [read post]
16 Oct 2020, 8:57 pm
Prohibition advocates, for example, claimed that people must be forced to stay away from "Demon Rum" no matter how much they like to drink, or how carefully they weigh the costs and benefits of doing so. [read post]
16 Oct 2020, 6:28 pm
Against Doe's protected rights, RPI's showing of the equities amounts to hollow portents of rampant sexual assault and the impermissible assumption that plaintiff is already guilty despite not having so much as a hearing on a matter of grave import to his future…. [read post]
16 Oct 2020, 4:00 pm
And the brief said, as a matter of original understanding, one could not be arrested or seized until he was in the physical custody of the seizer and within his control. [read post]
16 Oct 2020, 12:51 pm
No matter what answer I gave you, if I say it, that’s the headline tomorrow. [read post]
16 Oct 2020, 11:19 am
Michael Watts, Defendant (EDNY Memorandum and Order)Notice of Filing of a Proposed Rule Change to Amend the FINRA Codes of Arbitration Procedure to Increase Arbitrator Chairperson Honoraria and Certain Arbitration Fees (SEC Notice)Ex-President of Ohio Healthcare Management Company Pleads Guilty in $59 Million Check Kiting Scheme Targeting S&T Bank (DOJ Release)Six Defendants Charged in Scheme to Defraud Student Loan Programs of More Than $12 Million (DOJ Release)FINRA Imposes Fine and Suspension… [read post]
16 Oct 2020, 11:17 am
What's the matter, don't you understand retweets?!! [read post]
16 Oct 2020, 11:12 am
On October 16, 2020, USCIS announced it would increase its filing fee for “premium processing” of I-129 and I-140 petitions by close to 75 percent: from $1,440 to $2,500 ($1,500 for H-2B and R-1 petitions). [read post]
16 Oct 2020, 9:23 am
In some cases, matters have to be taken to court. [read post]
[Eugene Volokh] Revelation of Plaintiff's Gambling Addiction Doesn't Justify Pseudonymity or Sealing
16 Oct 2020, 6:13 am
.'" The Ninth Circuit has permitted plaintiffs to use pseudonyms in three situations: (1) when identification creates a risk of retaliatory physical or mental harm, (2) when anonymity is necessary to privacy in a matter of sensitive and highly personal nature, and (3) when the anonymous party is compelled to admit his or her intention to engage in illegal conduct thereby risking criminal prosecution. [read post]
16 Oct 2020, 5:01 am
Spencer is himself a newsworthy subject, and publishing information about him, even if tinged with personal dislike, can still be motivated by an interest to "disseminate information to the public," and to promote "debate over controversial matters. [read post]
