Search for: "Marks v. State " Results 6981 - 7000 of 21,693
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Jan 2018, 11:56 am by Lisa Ouellette
Although the case only involves § 271(f) on supplying components from the United States (also at issue in Life Tech. v. [read post]
22 Jan 2018, 11:56 am by Lisa Ouellette
Although the case only involves § 271(f) on supplying components from the United States (also at issue in Life Tech. v. [read post]
22 Jan 2018, 4:20 am by Edith Roberts
” At the Cato Institute’s Cato at Liberty blog, Ilya Shapiro and others highlight the amicus brief the Institute has filed in United States v. [read post]
22 Jan 2018, 4:00 am by Administrator
In a sea of reports on the state of the (large firm) legal industry, it’s nice to see recognition of their particular issues in Thomson Reuters’ State of US Small Law Firms Survey. [read post]
21 Jan 2018, 5:58 am
The Advocate General upheld the General Court’s decision that the State of Bavaria’s EUTM “Neuschwanstein”, a German fairy tale castle and popular tourist attraction, is not descriptive of the goods and services covered by the mark and not therefore not invalid. [read post]
19 Jan 2018, 11:38 am by Sarah Grant, Jack Goldsmith
Legal Basis The WPR letter’s stated legal authorities for the armed conflict against al-Qaeda, the Taliban, associated forces, and, since August 2014, the Islamic State (ISIS), are the 2001 and 2002 authorizations for the use of military force (AUMF), the president’s Article II commander-in-chief power, and his “constitutional and statutory authority to conduct the foreign relations of the United States. [read post]
19 Jan 2018, 6:10 am by Zietlow, Rebecca E.
After Reconstruction, the southern United States descended into the Jim Crow system marked by racialized violence, the deprivation of civil and political rights, and the exploitation of black labor. [read post]
19 Jan 2018, 3:39 am by Orin Kerr
First, the enactment of the Fourth Amendment was largely a response to a few high-profile English cases on general warrants, such as Entick v. [read post]
18 Jan 2018, 9:34 am by m zamora
v=mwloh #bauch lomb #dryeye #fdaapproval/clearance #imprmispharmaceuticals,” suggesting your compounded cyclosporine product – “Klarity-C drops” -- is FDA approved. [read post]
18 Jan 2018, 4:17 am by Edith Roberts
Mark Walsh offers a first-hand account of the argument for this blog. [read post]
18 Jan 2018, 4:00 am by John Gregory
All Australian states now have a dispensing power by statute. [read post]