Search for: "P. T.2"
Results 6981 - 7000
of 14,921
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Aug 2014, 12:15 pm
I don’t care who does it, whether it’s some court some place, or the United States Congress. [read post]
15 Aug 2014, 12:54 pm
Thus, the same opinion that starts out (p.18) quoting Wyeth v. [read post]
15 Aug 2014, 4:27 am
Portal officially launches September 8th 2. [read post]
13 Aug 2014, 5:52 am
P. 26(a)(2)(B)(i). [read post]
13 Aug 2014, 4:00 am
S’ajoute à l’attitude inacceptable du juge son refus répété, voire obstiné, de traiter ou même d’envisager l’objection de l’appelant relative à une preuve préjudiciable non divulguée, dont le contexte est que, pendant l’interrogatoire par la Couronne, le témoin incarcéré Dany Roy rapporte qu’un gardien de prison lui a expliqué que sa vie… [read post]
12 Aug 2014, 9:54 pm
Bd. (1970) 2 Cal.3d 943, 946, 88 Cal.Rptr. 175, 471 P.2d 975; accord, Empire Star Mines Co. v. [read post]
12 Aug 2014, 9:42 pm
(Id. at p. [read post]
12 Aug 2014, 9:22 pm
The impact of a 14 percent error on the judgment total would have been approximately $2 million. [read post]
12 Aug 2014, 11:07 am
Rose López 2. [read post]
11 Aug 2014, 8:09 am
The acts underlying the harassment charge included: (1) mailing the materials to P, with the intent to alarm or annoy both P and M; and (2) communicating the diary pages via Facebook (with the intent to alarm or annoy M). [read post]
10 Aug 2014, 8:00 pm
Daniel P. [read post]
10 Aug 2014, 4:00 am
Accueillie en partie (2 500 $). [read post]
9 Aug 2014, 8:49 am
The United States maintained that the Taxpayer’s conduct was “willful” for these reasons: (1) the Taxpayer intentionally concealed the offshore account, and (2) the Taxpayer’s actions were willful in that he was reckless or willfully blind in regard to his FBAR reporting obligation. [read post]
8 Aug 2014, 8:08 pm
Level 2: Rule R should determine the outcome of this dispute because of principle P (e.g., efficiency; fairness; market failure) that justifies rule R. [read post]
8 Aug 2014, 6:26 am
The court thus granted in part the government’s motion to dismiss (Martin v The United States, July 31, 2014, Campbell-Smith, P). [read post]
7 Aug 2014, 10:03 pm
P. 21. [read post]
7 Aug 2014, 5:12 pm
Es una póliza con una franquicia muy alta: técnicamente, sólo cubre violación de cuestiones federales o groserísimos errores de la sentencia.Varias de estas cosas fueron tratadas y resueltas por la Corte Interamericana precisamente en un caso que involucró a nuestro país, "Mohamed vs. [read post]
6 Aug 2014, 2:34 pm
The Court insisted that “intentional” didn’t really mean “intentional,” noting that Section 46(l) of the Restatement (Second) of Torts discusses emotional distress caused by either “intentional” or “reckless” conduct. [read post]
6 Aug 2014, 12:32 pm
The authors argue “the most likely explanation” for their result “is not a learning effect but a consequence of the personal relationships district judges develop with appellate judges while sitting at the court” (p. 28) – the effect appears to persist even for the (few) judges who sat by designation but never heard a claim construction appeal.I wouldn't be surprised if this study catches the eye of many a reversal-weary district judge. [read post]
6 Aug 2014, 6:04 am
Hay otra caja más chiquitita, equivalente más o menos a un 2%, que son bonos hipotecarios” [read post]
