Search for: "People v Favors" Results 6981 - 7000 of 11,774
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 May 2014, 4:36 pm by Stephen Bilkis
People v Guaman Court Discusses Whether the Judicial Hearing Officer at a Suppression Hearing was Biased The defendant was charged with two counts of driving while intoxicated DWI and one count of aggravated driving while intoxicated. [read post]
28 May 2014, 3:56 pm by Gustavo Arballo
No hubo suerte en primera instancia, donde recibieron un fallo adverso (de dos jueces, con una disidencia a favor) que se pronunció en Junio de 1951. [read post]
28 May 2014, 4:43 am by David DePaolo
Most state systems allow settlement of claims via some full release mechanism.In 2011 reform legislation allowed injured workers 55 and older to enter structured settlements, which the Department of Labor & Industries through its Board of Industrial Insurance Appeals would oversee to make sure that such settlements were adequate.Next year the age limitation decreases to 50.The Washington State FlagEarlier this month the Washington state Court of Appeals ruled in BIIA v. [read post]
27 May 2014, 9:01 pm by Michael C. Dorf
Last year, when the Supreme Court invalidated Section 3 of the Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA) in United States v. [read post]
27 May 2014, 8:49 am by Venkat Balasubramani
Instead it was given a much shorter treatment and made available to only a handful of people. [read post]
23 May 2014, 11:37 am by The Book Review Editor
The army also agreed to enter peace negotiations with the guerrillas, but both sides were far more interested in propping up their competing claims to represent the Guatemalan people than in making concessions. [read post]
22 May 2014, 2:06 pm by Venkat Balasubramani
The court then looks to the amount of the work used, and says that it’s neutral or slightly favors Caner. [read post]
20 May 2014, 8:49 am by WIMS
Appeals Court Environmental Decisions   <> People of the State of California v. [read post]
19 May 2014, 12:04 pm
[For those wish to the long-form legal argument, the Pacific Legal Foundation briefs in Sissel v. [read post]
19 May 2014, 10:52 am
The unpublished nature of the work undermines that in some measure (see, e.g., Harper & Row v. [read post]