Search for: "People v. Story"
Results 6981 - 7000
of 9,954
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Oct 2011, 9:34 pm
Board of Freeholders, No. 10-945, asks whether people arrested and held for minor offenses may be routinely strip-searched.The court will also consider, in Maples v. [read post]
2 Oct 2011, 2:31 am
The Facts Mr Ferdinand is a well known professional footballer with a distinguished playing career and the frequent subject of tabloid stories. [read post]
1 Oct 2011, 12:40 pm
by Eric Goldman Facebook, Inc. v. [read post]
1 Oct 2011, 2:56 am
In yet another decision demonstrating that a judge whose career was spent prosecuting can show the fortitude to suppress, Brooklyn Justice Mark Dwyer rejected the testimony of NYC Police Officer Robert McNamara, who falsely claimed consent to justify a search of an apartment to locate a weapon.In People v. [read post]
30 Sep 2011, 4:41 am
ruled AOK by Advertising Standards Bureau" http://j.mp/nn6CW8 "AOL + TechCrunch One Year Anniversary: A Look Back And A Look Forward" by @arrington http://j.mp/pN9NlM this is interesting: "Spotify Is Killing Piracy (in Sweden, at Least)" http://j.mp/pwYHvE #lwb486 wear shoes around the toe suck fairy: "'Toe Suck Fairy' Strikes Again, Arrested on New Toe-Sucking Charges" http://j.mp/pM8fyx this was always going to cause trouble with the police:… [read post]
30 Sep 2011, 1:48 am
(TorrentFreak) MCGIP – Who are MCGIP (and why are they suing for other people’s movies?) [read post]
29 Sep 2011, 2:18 pm
Judgment was handed down today in the case of Ferdinand v Mirror Group Newspapers ([2011] EWHC 2454 (QB)). [read post]
29 Sep 2011, 7:47 am
More on on Jurek v. [read post]
29 Sep 2011, 5:35 am
kcentv.com has further reporting on United States v. [read post]
29 Sep 2011, 5:31 am
Here is a link to a story in the AP, and here is Reuters. [read post]
28 Sep 2011, 7:21 am
" I understand what she is saying as a legal matter -- thanks to Employment Division v. [read post]
28 Sep 2011, 6:10 am
Now, yesterday, Anthony V. [read post]
27 Sep 2011, 9:01 pm
Consider that in Zelman v. [read post]
27 Sep 2011, 8:14 pm
And the Durham brief doesn’t mention that at least one of her “physical descriptions” from the March 16 meeting didn’t match any player on the lacrosse team, while those descriptions also didn’t even remotely resemble at least two of the people ultimately charged. [read post]
27 Sep 2011, 5:28 pm
Where yesterday it was Wal-Mart v. [read post]
27 Sep 2011, 11:06 am
From Dawn Donut Company, Inc. v. [read post]
27 Sep 2011, 10:18 am
Under Terry v. [read post]
27 Sep 2011, 8:41 am
Von Spakovsky’s source for this story is a 1984 Brooklyn grand jury report, and his abuse of this report is striking. [read post]
27 Sep 2011, 6:33 am
More: ACLU information on ACLU v. [read post]
27 Sep 2011, 4:35 am
"[H]aving deliberately availed himself of his right to remain silent, the defendant's failure to give a more complete exculpatory statement to the police 'may simply [have been] attributable to his awareness that he [was] under no obligation to speak' to the police, including to implicate his friend in a shooting, and to his knowledge that his decision not to speak would not be used against him at trial," the majority said in an unsigned opinion, citing the 1981 Court of… [read post]
