Search for: "Petite v. United States"
Results 6981 - 7000
of 13,105
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Mar 2014, 9:24 pm
Or both.United States v. [read post]
9 Mar 2014, 7:36 pm
” The first of these arguments seems to be a clear winner – since the statute particularly provides authority against “the sale within the United States after importation. [read post]
9 Mar 2014, 7:52 am
Core Wireless, on the other hand, is a non-United States corporation with one employee that exists solely to license its patent portfolio. [read post]
8 Mar 2014, 8:19 pm
Both parties filed petitions for review in the United States District Court for the District of Columbia, which deferred to the arbitrators and upheld the arbitration award. [read post]
8 Mar 2014, 7:19 am
See my post on UFO Chuting v. [read post]
7 Mar 2014, 6:42 am
In Courtney v. [read post]
6 Mar 2014, 10:45 am
The Federal Circuit’s ruling could be taken up by the United States Supreme Court next term, especially if the Solicitor General recommends granting the petition for certiorari that is sure to arrive at the Court in the next few months. [read post]
5 Mar 2014, 2:02 pm
Cir. 2014) (en banc rehearing) The Federal Circuit today granted the US Government’s petition for en banc rehearing of a case stemming from the United States Court of International Trade. [read post]
4 Mar 2014, 11:41 am
United States v. [read post]
3 Mar 2014, 8:40 pm
The Protestant Episcopal Church in the United States of America 13-449Issue: (1) Whether the First Amendment permits civil courts to retroactively impose a “trust” on church property based on church canons that were never embodied in any secular instrument of property ownership and did not comply with state law at the time of their adoption; (2) whether the Contracts Clause permits civil courts resolving church property disputes to apply changes to… [read post]
3 Mar 2014, 5:04 pm
Professor Ruthann Robson, City University of New York (CUNY) School of Law The United States Supreme Court today granted certiorari in Holt [Muhammad] v. [read post]
28 Feb 2014, 7:21 pm
In Nexans Inc. et al. v. [read post]
28 Feb 2014, 11:48 am
As a result, the court relied heavily on an older California Supreme Court case, Miller v. [read post]
28 Feb 2014, 10:50 am
The United States Attorney General notoriously failed to defend the anti-Miranda statute in the Dickerson case back in 1999. [read post]
27 Feb 2014, 2:29 pm
It sent shockwaves through the cyberlaw community, so when the inevitable petition for rehearing is filed, expect to see a long list of who’s who among internet companies as potential amici. [read post]
27 Feb 2014, 1:42 pm
Fans of IFP petitions, do not despair: Martinez v. [read post]
27 Feb 2014, 1:17 pm
United States, No. 13-403. [read post]
27 Feb 2014, 9:38 am
See United States v. [read post]
26 Feb 2014, 8:13 am
The Court of Appeals began its analysis of the issues in the case by explaining that in 2006, the United States Congress passed, and the President signed, the Adam Walsh Child Protection and Safety Act of 2006 (`AWA). [read post]
25 Feb 2014, 7:05 pm
The petition of the day is: Terry v. [read post]
