Search for: "Powers v. Powers" Results 6981 - 7000 of 55,734
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 May 2022, 4:00 am by Jim Sedor
Campaign Finance South Carolina: “SC GOP Lawmaker Settles 133 Alleged Campaign Finance Violations for Fine, Public Reprimand” by Zak Koeske (The State) for MSN Elections Florida: “Appeals Court Reinstates Florida’s 2021 Election Law Provisions Struck Gown by Judge” by Steven Lemongello (Orlando Sentinel) for MSN Georgia: “Challenge Over Marjorie Taylor Greene’s Eligibility Fails” by Kate Brumback (Associated Press) for Yahoo News Ethics National:… [read post]
9 May 2022, 1:35 am by INFORRM
The BBC covers a proposed Criminal Procedure (Identification) law that would give sweeping powers to law enforcement agencies to collect biometric data, which has sparked concerns over privacy. [read post]
8 May 2022, 2:26 pm by INFORRM
That article gives the Council the power to adopt a decision defining the approach of the Union to a particular matter of a geographical or thematic nature and expects Member States to ensure that their national policies conform to the positions of the Union. [read post]
8 May 2022, 11:32 am by Giles Peaker
The Upper Tribunal goes on to note that none of this should have happened in view of the guidance given in Avon Ground Rents Ltd v Child (2018) UKUT 204 (LC) (our note). [read post]
8 May 2022, 10:02 am by Eric Goldman
Finally, even if Hart had plausibly pleaded that the Federal Defendants exercised coercive power over the companies’ misinformation policies, he still fails to specifically allege that they coerced action as to him In a footnote, the court adds: “It is still more difficult to understand how general legislative debates, such as those surrounding Section 230, could provide a President with coercive power over a private company sufficient to confer state action. [read post]
8 May 2022, 1:43 am by Neil Wilkof
The latter restricts the Registrar’s power to act pre-grant for the protection of section 5 rights. [read post]
8 May 2022, 12:27 am by Frank Cranmer
Luke Fletcher, BatesWells: Butler-Sloss v Charity Commission: understanding trustee investment duties and powers in the new landscape: “provides comfort that there is no single ‘right’ investment policy for trustees to adopt. [read post]
7 May 2022, 7:53 pm by Russell Knight
” In re Marriage of Crook, 813 NE 2d 198 – Ill: Supreme Court 2004 The sum an elderly non-payor owes is probably astronomical thanks to the power of compounding interest. [read post]
7 May 2022, 9:41 am by Rick Garnett
by Geof Stone, in which he shared what he called a "painfully awkward observation" that the justices in the majority of the Court's Gonzales v. [read post]