Search for: "STATE V. POWERS"
Results 6981 - 7000
of 41,391
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Feb 2024, 7:35 am
Link: Listen to Live Arguments at the Court The case, Trump v. [read post]
25 Jan 2012, 6:00 am
David Sloss’s article, Executing Foster v. [read post]
4 May 2020, 5:03 am
& Hosp. v. [read post]
19 Oct 2019, 1:38 pm
Walden v. [read post]
15 Apr 2024, 9:05 pm
In SEC v. [read post]
3 May 2010, 1:56 pm
” State v. [read post]
20 Apr 2021, 1:24 pm
In outline, these created a power for the Secretary of State to refuse an immigration application where the applicant was a rough sleeper or to cancel an existing permission for the same reason. [read post]
7 Apr 2014, 10:19 am
Circuit in Doe v. [read post]
25 Jun 2008, 1:54 am
How broadly or narrowly the Court rules will play an important part in what the decision means in practice: Will states and municipalities that are not federal enclaves have more, less or the same power to restrict guns? [read post]
29 Mar 2009, 11:37 am
In short, the non-delegation doctrine is the Roe v. [read post]
15 Jun 2019, 6:50 pm
United States v. [read post]
25 Feb 2008, 8:42 am
The Supreme Court granted cert today in Carcieri v. [read post]
23 Jul 2024, 7:53 am
The Supreme Court struck down the Obama rule in a case called West Virginia v. [read post]
11 Jul 2016, 5:30 am
Hemisphere Assocs. v. [read post]
21 Dec 2021, 3:00 pm
First, Jacoby's restricts not only federal power to bar migrants but also that of the states. [read post]
2 Dec 2012, 8:41 pm
Raich, it has been clear that federal power under the Commerce Clause extends to marijuana grown within a state for purposes of consumption within that state, even if legal under state law. [read post]
6 Apr 2007, 10:24 am
It calls for difficult political balances and bargaining with foreign powers beyond SCOTUS's reach. [read post]
1 Dec 2009, 2:12 pm
Div., A-3184-08T1, December 1, 2009: As stated in Massar v. [read post]
5 Aug 2010, 8:28 am
But at this point, it is clear that advocates for unlimited corporate power hope and imagine that the U.S. [read post]
28 Apr 2011, 10:03 am
A win for the plutocracy* Yesterday’s decision in AT&T Mobility LLC v. [read post]
