Search for: "STATE v FIELD"
Results 6981 - 7000
of 12,942
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Jul 2014, 12:28 pm
Williams v. [read post]
18 Jul 2014, 11:55 am
See also Fields v. [read post]
18 Jul 2014, 6:45 am
The case is Jones v. [read post]
17 Jul 2014, 1:48 pm
United States, 338 U.S. 160 (1949). [read post]
17 Jul 2014, 1:48 pm
United States, 338 U.S. 160 (1949). [read post]
17 Jul 2014, 11:01 am
Zacchini v. [read post]
17 Jul 2014, 7:34 am
Note: The stated purpose was as quoted, until the Charter was amended in 2012 -- see below.] [read post]
15 Jul 2014, 10:11 am
Supreme Court Rules Against Aereo Place-and-Time-Shifting Technology Case Note by Gordon Firemark On June 25, the United States Supreme Court issued its much-anticipated ruling in American Broadcasting Co v. [read post]
15 Jul 2014, 6:25 am
Federal Laws Do Not Allow an Attorney to Be Present But federal maritime laws are much different that state, and a federal court recently ruled in Davanzo v. [read post]
14 Jul 2014, 7:31 pm
The Governing Body and Its ResponsibilitiesIn January 2000, the State Council formed the Western Region Development Leading Group headed by Premier Zhu Rongji, deputy headed by Vice Premier Wen Jiabao and attended by 19 directors from the State Council and relevant ministries. [read post]
14 Jul 2014, 4:45 pm
” United States v. [read post]
14 Jul 2014, 9:55 am
Luck Brothers, Inc. v. [read post]
14 Jul 2014, 7:43 am
Soon after she returned, he joined her for a “field ride. [read post]
14 Jul 2014, 5:56 am
* Retail omerta: Wilko v Buyology David pens a note on last week's High Court of Justice, England and Wales, decision in Wilko Retail Ltd v Buyology Ltd. [read post]
13 Jul 2014, 11:00 pm
Section 1 (3) defines the “art” to mean the art or field of knowledge to which an invention relates and “the state of the art” means everything concerning that art or field of knowledge which has been made available to the public anywhere and at any time whatever (by means of a written or oral description, by use or in any other way) before the date of the filing of the patent application relating to the invention... [read post]
13 Jul 2014, 8:45 pm
Although the first prong of this two-prong test is not labeled as such, it is essentially the same type of inquiry as the "predominant purpose/secondary effects" test enunciated by the United States Supreme Court in City of Renton v. [read post]
12 Jul 2014, 12:27 pm
I was perfectly content with my life until Jeremy suggested that I blog about the United States Patent and Trademark Office (TTAB) Harry Winston v. [read post]
12 Jul 2014, 4:27 am
This post discussed Sawaf v. [read post]
11 Jul 2014, 10:35 am
James Pohl, the judge in the Guantanamo case of U.S. v. [read post]
11 Jul 2014, 9:53 am
" That, in essence is the core of the issue (nicely dressed up in the increasingly arcane language of American constitutional law) addressed in the various opinions in the Hobby Lobby case (Burwell v. [read post]
