Search for: "See v. See"
Results 6981 - 7000
of 121,996
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Mar 2023, 10:00 pm
In any event, respondent was entitled to submit the affidavit on its cross motion, and the court properly considered it in evaluating the merits of petitioner's claim (see Basis Yield Alpha Fund [Master] v Goldman Sachs Group, Inc., 115 AD3d 128, 134-135 [1st Dept 2014]; see also Guggenheimer v Ginzburg, 43 NY2d 268, 275 [1977]). [read post]
24 Mar 2023, 3:30 pm
Also see, Felony Charges under Texas and Federal Law: Criminal Defense Overview. [read post]
24 Mar 2023, 2:22 pm
See, e.g., Khawar v. [read post]
24 Mar 2023, 12:30 pm
In Knick v. [read post]
24 Mar 2023, 11:37 am
See: Yost v. [read post]
24 Mar 2023, 11:31 am
" See id. [read post]
24 Mar 2023, 10:20 am
On Monday, in United States v. [read post]
24 Mar 2023, 10:18 am
Sackett v. [read post]
24 Mar 2023, 10:09 am
[See more]2DAVI: Says who? [read post]
24 Mar 2023, 9:21 am
Steel Domestic Sales, LLC v. [read post]
24 Mar 2023, 7:48 am
§ 2401(a), see Old Regs, forthcoming in the George Mason Law Review.) [read post]
24 Mar 2023, 6:30 am
United States, Rule 10b-5, SEC enforcement, Securities fraud, United States v. [read post]
24 Mar 2023, 6:30 am
United States, Rule 10b-5, SEC enforcement, Securities fraud, United States v. [read post]
24 Mar 2023, 6:00 am
The court then explained that an "appointment of an individual from a constitutionally valid expired list violates Article V, §6 of the NY Constitution" citing Matter of City of New York v New York State Div. of Human Rights, 93 NY2d 768.* Nevertheless, in light of the conditional offer of employment given to Plaintiff, and his request for back pay, the Appellate Division denied the Respondents' request that the Appellate Division dismiss Plaintiff's appeal… [read post]
24 Mar 2023, 6:00 am
The court then explained that an "appointment of an individual from a constitutionally valid expired list violates Article V, §6 of the NY Constitution" citing Matter of City of New York v New York State Div. of Human Rights, 93 NY2d 768.* Nevertheless, in light of the conditional offer of employment given to Plaintiff, and his request for back pay, the Appellate Division denied the Respondents' request that the Appellate Division dismiss Plaintiff's appeal… [read post]
24 Mar 2023, 5:01 am
Circuit digs in more on the Appointment Clause issue, it will see it as having more force. [read post]
24 Mar 2023, 3:58 am
See section 14(3). [read post]
24 Mar 2023, 3:08 am
Steel Domestic Sales, LLC v. [read post]
24 Mar 2023, 1:57 am
The ink is barely dry on Justice Mellor's InterDigital v. [read post]
23 Mar 2023, 10:00 pm
Take another example: the Clean Power Plan overturned by the Supreme Court in West Virginia v. [read post]