Search for: "Small v. People"
Results 6981 - 7000
of 8,423
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Oct 2010, 3:07 am
This leads to a very small 3 % reduction in texting while driving. [read post]
5 Oct 2010, 5:00 pm
Are You Getting Drunk by the People Who Are Trying to Foreclose Your Home? [read post]
5 Oct 2010, 7:58 am
And, of course, the worst single feature of that Constitution is not even the Senate, but Article V, which, by basically making it impossible to amend the Constitution with regard to anything significant, creates an overwhelming incentive for smart people like Friedman to prattle on at his Georgetown and Silicon Valley and Davos dinner parties about the need for "better" and "more virtuous" people to take over our political system without ever, for even… [read post]
5 Oct 2010, 5:55 am
Background In Edwards v. [read post]
5 Oct 2010, 5:18 am
Consider John Marshall's opinion in United States v. [read post]
4 Oct 2010, 4:09 pm
The case is Snyder v. [read post]
4 Oct 2010, 7:05 am
We care how much other people make, not because we care about their financial well-being, but because we want to put their number down on the table and measure it against our own. [read post]
4 Oct 2010, 1:44 am
Int’l, Inc. v. [read post]
3 Oct 2010, 11:01 pm
At Balkinization, guest blogger Sharon Dolovich explains why the Supreme Court’s Farmer v. [read post]
2 Oct 2010, 4:26 pm
Led by its Presiding Bishop, ECUSA is in the middle of being transformed by a small group from within, and the average congregation and their clergy as yet have no awareness of the scope of the changes. [read post]
2 Oct 2010, 8:43 am
Senate, Governor of Indiana, Governor of Montana, Maryland Senate, Vermont Senate, New York City Council, Southern Medical Association, ESOMAR, NC Pharmacy Association, The Prescription Access Litigation Project, Minnesota Senior Federation, Danske Bank, Sveriges Riksdag, Sveriges Radio Sommar, Svenska Nyhetsbrev AB, Entreprenörsdagen, Stockholms Läns Landsting, Läkemedelskommittén i Jämtlands län, Gräv 08-Undersökande Journalister,… [read post]
2 Oct 2010, 3:53 am
Newman wrote in LoDuca v. [read post]
1 Oct 2010, 10:01 am
The doctrinal problem, for opponents of the law (like us), is that the Court some time ago, in Ginsberg v. [read post]
1 Oct 2010, 5:25 am
" By "these," he was, by way of an email to others at the company, referring to a small group of pharmaceutical drugs the rights to which Lundbeck was in the process of acquiring from Merck, including Indocin IV. [read post]
30 Sep 2010, 8:19 pm
In uBID, Inc. v. [read post]
30 Sep 2010, 6:52 am
However, the Circuit Court decision in People (DPP) v Kelly is relevant. [read post]
30 Sep 2010, 3:40 am
Gates v. [read post]
29 Sep 2010, 9:36 am
[Warning to readers--only peripherally about tax] In January of 2010 in Citizens United v. [read post]
28 Sep 2010, 7:51 pm
The other is a small, aesthetically different house of worship. [read post]
28 Sep 2010, 1:34 pm
(And, as noted in my earlier post, “I was among the small army of people who filed an amicus brief” supporting BATCO.) [read post]
