Search for: "State v House"
Results 6981 - 7000
of 28,333
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Sep 2019, 6:11 am
It would add wildlife trafficking to the State Department’s definition of organized crime. [read post]
24 Sep 2019, 6:00 am
Seibert v. [read post]
24 Sep 2019, 4:01 am
In Twenty Holdings, LLC v. [read post]
23 Sep 2019, 5:29 pm
LaForce v. [read post]
23 Sep 2019, 11:27 am
The first type—an assertion of presidential communications privilege—represents the core of executive privilege that was first recognized in U.S. v. [read post]
23 Sep 2019, 6:57 am
In Zervos v. [read post]
23 Sep 2019, 5:08 am
(Unlike the U.S., the U.K. has not separated government computer security into national security and non-national security sides of the house.) [read post]
23 Sep 2019, 4:02 am
Take the case of Hutto v. [read post]
23 Sep 2019, 3:25 am
A view from the Mary Quantexhibition at the V&AOn Monday evening, the Victoria & Albert Museum saw over two-thousand attendees pour through its marble and tiled halls for AIPPI's Cultural Evening. [read post]
21 Sep 2019, 7:36 am
” State v. [read post]
20 Sep 2019, 8:00 am
Question: Henson v. [read post]
20 Sep 2019, 7:44 am
Newsom (Tribal-State Compacts) U.S. [read post]
20 Sep 2019, 6:00 am
The House Judiciary Committee held a hearing Sept. 18 on oversight of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA), examining specifically whether to reauthorize four provisions of the act set to expire in December. [read post]
19 Sep 2019, 12:00 pm
Sandford (1857) Ex Parte Merryman (1861) United States v. [read post]
19 Sep 2019, 11:01 am
The bill creating the greatest buzz has been AB 5, which would codify the California Supreme Court’s 2018 decision in Dynamex Operations West, Inc. v. [read post]
New plot twist: CFPB agrees its structure is unconstitutional; Ballard Spahr to hold Oct. 22 webinar
19 Sep 2019, 10:36 am
The announcement was made in identical letters sent by Director Kraninger to House Speaker Nancy Pelosi and Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell. [read post]
19 Sep 2019, 10:01 am
The constitutional importance of this point is clear: in R (on the application of Bancoult) v Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs, which was cited by Lord Pannick on behalf of Gina Miller during his oral submissions, Lord Hoffmann held that ‘the unique authority Parliament derives from its representative character’. [read post]
19 Sep 2019, 9:56 am
[Just testified this morning before the House Ways & Means Committee Oversight Subcommittee about this.] [read post]
19 Sep 2019, 8:42 am
In August 1876, the Blaine Amendment easily passed the Article V two-thirds threshold in the House, 180-7. [read post]
19 Sep 2019, 7:32 am
As previously reported, after the Department of Justice dropped its appeal of the district court's decision in United States v. [read post]
