Search for: "State v. Powers" Results 6981 - 7000 of 36,866
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Oct 2019, 3:52 am
In short: no trade, no trademark.Two US Court of Appeals opinions have created the possibility that a plaintiff could bring a passing-off action based on use of its trademark outside of the United States only – a powerful new tool for challenging infringers that are first to use the trademark in the United StatesFollowing the Supreme Court’s 2014 decision in Lexmark International, Inc v Static Control Components, Inc (572 US ___, 134 S Ct 1377 (2014)),… [read post]
22 Oct 2015, 5:59 am by Amy Howe
” At Illinois Public Radio, Verity Winship weighs in on United States v. [read post]
6 Nov 2023, 4:00 am by Administrator
In an increasingly complex state, there’s often overlap of powers. [read post]
27 Mar 2015, 3:38 am by Amy Howe
At Cato at Liberty, Walter Olson weighs in on Wednesday’s opinion in Young v. [read post]
22 Apr 2016, 7:57 am by Amy Howe
Monday’s oral argument in United States v. [read post]
23 Dec 2010, 6:19 am by Jeff Gamso
  Here's the basic rule, taken from State ex rel Healey v. [read post]
27 Aug 2007, 6:01 am
This essay explores these issues through the lens of one of the most important international law cases in the United States in at least the last decade: Hamdan v. [read post]
30 May 2008, 4:50 am
The Court handed down Riley v Kennedy, 07-77, this week. [read post]
18 Sep 2013, 3:31 am by Susan Brenner
’ She stated Michele had power of attorney to act on [her] behalf, as did [her] parents. [read post]
21 Oct 2010, 10:00 am by The Legal Blog
Girdharilal Yadav (2004) 6 SCC 325; State of Maharashtra v. [read post]
27 Jan 2025, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar
Missouri has the power to withhold state assistance, “but the means it uses to achieve its ends must be [, as the Court observed in McCulloch v. [read post]
27 Apr 2021, 10:46 am by Mark Latham
ShareOn Wednesday, the justices will hear argument in PennEast Pipeline Co. v. [read post]
18 Apr 2012, 2:36 am by J
R (MD)(Afghanistan) v Secretary of State [2012] EWCA Civ 194 is an immigration case but merits wider attention because of what it has to say about the interplay between renewing a judicial review claim and appeals. [read post]