Search for: "State v. So "
Results 6981 - 7000
of 116,393
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 May 2023, 5:01 am
In Mitchell v. [read post]
22 May 2023, 4:37 am
The power to do so would be based on an “independent state legislature” theory that cites the U.S. [read post]
22 May 2023, 4:30 am
Bremerton School Dist. and West Virginia v EPA. [read post]
22 May 2023, 4:15 am
Can the Lanham Act apply to the conduct of foreign entities occurring entirely outside the United States and, if so, what is the test? [read post]
22 May 2023, 4:15 am
Can the Lanham Act apply to the conduct of foreign entities occurring entirely outside the United States and, if so, what is the test? [read post]
22 May 2023, 4:07 am
Relying principally on Sternberg v. [read post]
22 May 2023, 4:00 am
New York State's Civil Service Law §75(1) provides an employee in the classified service of a public employer covered by the statute "shall not be removed or otherwise subjected to any disciplinary penalty except for incompetency or misconduct shown after a hearing upon stated charges"; and 2. [read post]
22 May 2023, 4:00 am
New York State's Civil Service Law §75(1) provides an employee in the classified service of a public employer covered by the statute "shall not be removed or otherwise subjected to any disciplinary penalty except for incompetency or misconduct shown after a hearing upon stated charges"; and 2. [read post]
22 May 2023, 4:00 am
In Arizona v. [read post]
22 May 2023, 12:13 am
So far as “cogency, seriousness, cohesion and importance” was concerned, it had been held in McEleney v Ministry of Defence [2017] UKET S/4105347/2017 that a belief in Scottish independence and how Scotland should be governed was sufficiently serious to meet that test. [read post]
21 May 2023, 9:05 pm
v=2pp17E4E-O8. [read post]
21 May 2023, 9:01 pm
Supreme Court’s decision in Erie Railroad Company v. [read post]
21 May 2023, 9:00 pm
The most straightforward way to understand his thinking is apparently that the pendency of the inevitable lawsuits would so roil the financial markets that the economy would be damaged in the meantime—AND that doing so would be worse than the alternatives.Again, he is right that there would be a political crisis, and the days, weeks, or months that the world would spend waiting for a resolution would make the 2000 Bush v. [read post]
21 May 2023, 1:41 pm
As Florida’ Fourth District Court of Appeal explained in Zodiac Records Inc. v. [read post]
21 May 2023, 12:28 pm
Preferably, there will be minimal resort to war powers for expelling freedom-seekers, but (as I wrote), "It is unfortunate that the civil power of the states has been so constricted by judicial error that we have to discuss the military power now as well, and the civil power alone might be sufficient were it not for cases like Arizona v. [read post]
21 May 2023, 11:33 am
Supreme Court's decision in New York State Rifle and Pistol Association v. [read post]
21 May 2023, 11:33 am
Supreme Court's decision in New York State Rifle and Pistol Association v. [read post]
19 May 2023, 4:29 pm
State v. [read post]
19 May 2023, 3:40 pm
Mazo v. [read post]
19 May 2023, 2:30 pm
Taamneh and a companion case, Gonzalez v. [read post]
