Search for: "Summers v. Summers" Results 6981 - 7000 of 9,114
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Mar 2018, 6:38 am by The Law Offices of John Day, P.C.
  Of course, he already had a day job but he agreed since the trials were scheduled during the Court’s summer hiatus. [read post]
3 Nov 2010, 3:11 pm by Erik Gerding
By contrast, Congress doesn’t have a veto in ordinary rulemaking and adjudication by agencies (cases like INS v. [read post]
25 Feb 2014, 1:58 pm by admin
While the liability decision in this case had been issued last summer (for a summary of some of the key points of the case see my earlier post: Rogers Largely Wins Landmark Chatr Misleading Advertising and Performance Claims Case and Canadian Lawyer comment earlier today: Rogers Escapes Steep Fine), the remedies were to be decided at a later date and have now been determined. [read post]
23 Nov 2022, 11:07 am by Eugene Volokh
I encouraged her to write up a blog post, and she kindly passed along the following: In the November 9th oral argument for Haaland v. [read post]
30 Jul 2008, 6:22 am
"  The first thing I noticed was that the post failed to provide the case name, which happens to be U.S. v. [read post]
5 Apr 2018, 3:33 am by Scott Bomboy
Fueling these theories were comments made in a 2017 Supreme Court decision, Packingham v. [read post]
26 Mar 2009, 1:18 pm
Dunoff1039 EPSTEIN: SUPREME NEGLECT: HOW TO REVIVE CONSTITUTIONAL PROTECTION FOR PRIVATE PROPERTYWilliam Michael Treanor1059 SULLIVAN, COLBY, WELSH WEGNER, BOND, & SHULMAN: EDUCATING LAWYERS: PREPARATION FOR THE PROFESSION OF LAWAnthony V. [read post]
27 Jun 2007, 6:22 pm
In modern times, the expression Pandora's "Box" is a version of "curiosity killed the cat" or as referred to in Wikipedia, "a metaphor for the unanticipated and irreversible consequences of technical and scientific development" Old "dirigible" Patrick "Hindenberg's" commentary, about the Pullman & Comley summer 2007 newsletter segment about Joseph v City of New York,… [read post]