Search for: "United States v. Burden" Results 6981 - 7000 of 9,848
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Nov 2019, 7:30 am by Will Baude
United States, 564 U.S. 229 (2011), retroactivity and remedy are distinct questions. [read post]
13 Jan 2021, 12:41 pm by Robert Guite and Abby Meyer
  To state a claim for false advertising, the burden is on the plaintiff to show that there is no vanilla in the product. [read post]
13 Jan 2021, 12:41 pm by Robert Guite and Abby Meyer
  To state a claim for false advertising, the burden is on the plaintiff to show that there is no vanilla in the product. [read post]
13 Jan 2021, 12:41 pm by Robert Guite and Abby Meyer
  To state a claim for false advertising, the burden is on the plaintiff to show that there is no vanilla in the product. [read post]
1 Apr 2008, 8:27 am
John Dudas and the United States Patent and Trademark Office. [read post]
23 Nov 2019, 11:12 am by Patricia Salkin
Since the 1920s States have given ultimate zoning authority to their local government units. [read post]
29 Jul 2011, 5:46 pm by Michael M. O'Hear
The court relies almost entirely on statutory interpretation cases from the United States Supreme Court. [read post]
5 Oct 2017, 3:33 pm by Daphne Keller
Remaking the DMCA in such a way would shift almost the entire burden and cost of enforcement from copyright holders to OSPs. [read post]
21 Feb 2022, 2:37 pm by Eugene Volokh
" A prior panel precedent is "undermined," we explained in United States v. [read post]
14 May 2015, 1:21 pm by Patricia Salkin
Thereafter, MIA brought suit, contending that the denial of its petition violated: (a) RLUIPA’s substantial burden, nondiscrimination, and equal terms provisions; (b) the Establishment Clause under the state and Federal constitutions; and (c) the state and federal Equal Protection Clause. [read post]
6 Jun 2018, 9:00 am by Josh Blackman
In contrast, the independent-counsel statute at issue in Morrison v. [read post]
11 Jan 2023, 2:40 pm by John Elwood
United States, she seeks to revisit that conclusion, arguing that because the provisions are avowedly deterrent and non-compensatory, they are subject to the Eighth Amendment’s excessive fines clause. [read post]