Search for: "United States v. Good"
Results 6981 - 7000
of 21,077
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Jun 2013, 4:58 am
There are too many variables from state to state to say that something is up on the constitutionality of laws in workers' compensation because work comp is a statutory creature - there are no "common law" elements that would trigger a United States Constitutional challenge. [read post]
2 Nov 2015, 2:23 pm
Here is the abstract: In Kelo v. [read post]
18 Apr 2024, 6:15 am
The case, Thaler v. [read post]
13 May 2016, 4:00 am
Perspective: Oracle v. [read post]
16 Jul 2010, 1:35 am
United States Postal Service, a summary order initially decided on May 12 before the Court of Appeals pulled the decision and reissued it on July 12. [read post]
8 Aug 2014, 9:58 am
The case is United States v. [read post]
20 Jul 2019, 7:03 am
United States, a recent Court of International Trade decision answering the burning question: Is a seat that you strap to a bicycle a seat or is it a bike accessory? [read post]
14 Mar 2015, 11:31 am
United States, Customs has decided to revoke the earlier ruling and classify the merchandise in Heading 9018 as instruments and appliances used in medical, surgical, dental or veterinary sciences . . . . [read post]
15 Oct 2013, 3:40 am
Solohay, Inc. v. [read post]
12 Jan 2015, 3:47 am
As was stated by Lord Justice Gibson in Asprey & Garrard Ltd v WRA (Guns) Ltd: "...the defence has never been held to apply to names of new companies as otherwise a route to piracy would be obvious". [read post]
15 Sep 2021, 1:56 pm
That method states that the drawback will be 99% of the lesser of the duties, taxes, and fees paid on the imported goods or on the exported goods had they been imported. [read post]
17 May 2013, 8:43 am
As the First Circuit's case in United States v. [read post]
1 May 2017, 10:00 pm
With respect to this lawsuit, the band claims common law trademark rights in the HOTEL CALIFORNIA mark for the goods listed above and also cite a pending application to register the mark with the United State Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO). [read post]
3 Sep 2024, 6:30 am
United States and Katzenbach v. [read post]
18 Apr 2016, 10:44 am
We previously reported on the United States Supreme Court’s decision in Campbell-Ewald Co. v. [read post]
20 Feb 2009, 11:42 am
Justice Ann Walsh Bradley wrote, "I write separately in order to express my concern that the United States Supreme Court's interpretation of the 1976 Medical Device Amendments does not adequately protect the safety of the citizens of Wisconsin. [read post]
19 Mar 2012, 11:34 am
How many know that this is the direct result of the Court’s 5-4 decision in Citizens United v. [read post]
30 Jun 2021, 3:19 pm
For example, United States v. [read post]
27 Jun 2008, 5:57 pm
Co. et al. v. [read post]
26 Feb 2015, 9:19 am
United States, or (b) “preventing further [government] disclosure,” United States v. [read post]
