Search for: "United States v. Justice" Results 6981 - 7000 of 32,502
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Aug 2010, 8:50 am by Brian A. Comer
As Justice Kittridge states in the lead-in paragraph:This case concerns whether Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standard 205 (49 C.F.R. [read post]
27 May 2009, 4:11 am
"* The Supremacy Clause, Article VI, Clause 2, provides: "This Constitution, and the Laws of the United States which shall be made in Pursuance thereof; and all Treaties made, or which shall be made, under the Authority of the United States, shall be the supreme Law of the Land; and the Judges in every State shall be bound thereby, any Thing in the Constitution or Laws of any State to the Contrary notwithstanding. [read post]
30 Sep 2008, 8:05 pm
Brotherhood of Railway Clerks (1984) and Lehnert v. [read post]
7 Mar 2022, 9:57 am by Eric Goldman
  (A “United States work” is a work first published in the United States, or simultaneously published in the United States and any foreign country; or an unpublished work (or a work first published in a nation with whom the United States does not have a copyright treaty) for which all authors are citizens of or domiciled in the United States. 17 U.S.C. [read post]
4 Nov 2009, 11:32 am
Joe Harris Sullivan is one of two teenagers that young currently doing life without parole for a nonhomicide offense in the United States. [read post]
30 Apr 2007, 8:06 am
The widely splintered ruling, announced by the Chief Justice, came in United Haulers Association v. [read post]
9 Jun 2011, 7:50 am by Lawrence Solum
Here is the abstract: Professor Mark Tushnet contends that Roper v. [read post]
25 Apr 2018, 6:50 am by Jan von Hein
As in Kiobel, the facts of the case barely touch and concern the territory of the United States. [read post]
27 May 2024, 3:30 am by Rebecca Zietlow
Rebecca Zietlow The United States Supreme Court ruling in Dobbs v. [read post]
7 Mar 2014, 1:34 am by Dr Jeremias Prassl
This principle was famously laid down in the case of Sidhu v British Airways (where passengers could not sue at common law for harm resulting from their plane having been high jacked following the Iraqi invasion of Kuwait), and subsequently applied by senior courts around the world, including notably the United States Supreme Court in El Al Israel Airlines v Tseng (though Justice Stevens there dissented). [read post]
5 Nov 2012, 8:13 am by Betty S.W. Graumlich
Grubbs moved to dismiss the claims against him, filed in the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia. [read post]