Search for: "v. "
Results 6981 - 7000
of 493,828
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Aug 2007, 1:43 am
Declaration of criminality made in civil proceedings Hawkes v. [read post]
24 Feb 2009, 1:42 am
Protectacoat Firthglow Ltd v Szilagyi [2009] EWCA Civ 98; [2009] WLR (D) 67 “In determining whether a person who had carried out work for a company was its employee within the meaning of s 230 of the Employment Rights Act 1996, if the document purporting to retain the services of a person did not represent the [...] [read post]
5 May 2007, 1:43 pm
Capitol Records v. [read post]
28 Feb 2011, 1:44 am
Regina v Vasili [2011] WLR (D) 58 “If an object had all the characteristics of a flick knife, it would therefore be considered an offensive weapon per se: the fact that the same object functioned also as a lighter did not stop it being an offensive weapon. [read post]
11 Feb 2010, 2:55 am
R v Carter (David) [2010] WLR (D) 29 “Where a member of the jury had to be discharged, at whatever stage of the trial, there was no requirement that the remaining members of the jury be directed to ignore the views expressed on any subject by the departed juror. [read post]
4 Nov 2011, 9:22 am
On November 1, 2011, the Supreme Court heard oral argument in Minneci v. [read post]
5 Aug 2009, 9:05 am
Yesterday, the Federalist Society posted a brief recording of Richard Epstein discussing Locke v. [read post]
21 Apr 2008, 1:45 am
Regina v Plant Court of Appeal (Criminal Division) “Where a summary offence was tried with an indictable offence in the crown court but there was no case to answer on the indictable offence, the summary offence did not have to be withdrawn from the jury and retried before justices. [read post]
7 Jul 2009, 2:35 am
Masood and others v Zahoor and others [2009] EWCA 650; [2009] WLR (D) 231 “Where a claimant relied on a forged document he forfeited the right to have an adjudication of his claim, and it was irrelevant that the defendant also relied on forged documents. [read post]
26 Nov 2008, 10:13 am
Regina v Doody Court of Appeal (Criminal Division) “Where a defendant raised delay to undermine the credibility of a complainant in a rape case, an appropriate warning to the jury was necessary to ensure fairness to the complainant. [read post]
2 Mar 2009, 3:00 am
Office of Communications v Information Comr; [2009] WLR (D) 71 “When balancing the public interest in maintaining an exception to disclosure of environmental information against the public interest in its disclosure the correct test was to consider whether the aggregate public interest in maintaining the exception outweighed the public interest in disclosure. [read post]
30 May 2007, 2:47 am
Elements of kidnapping were not made out Regina v. [read post]
16 May 2008, 1:56 am
Regina v Nguyen Court of Appeal (Criminal Division) “Where the Crown chose to rely on relevant bad character evidence which it had decided not to make the subject of a criminal charge, that could not have such an adverse effect on the fairness of the proceedings that the court ought not to admit such evidence. [read post]
25 Nov 2008, 9:55 am
Regina v Kelleher Court of Appeal (Criminal Division) “A custodial sentence could be appropriate for an offence of commercial flytipping even where aggravating features, such as depositing waste of a dangerous or offensive nature, were not present. [read post]
21 Aug 2008, 8:47 am
Regina v Norman Court of Appeal (Criminal Division) “Once it was clear that there was an issue as to unfitness to plead, it was necessary to ensure very careful case management so that full information was provided to the court without delay. [read post]
15 Feb 2008, 2:52 am
Piggott v Director of Public Prosecutions “There was no obligation on an individual, required under s 7(1) of the Road Traffic Act 1988 to provide a specimen of breath for analysis, to declare a medical condition which might make it difficult or impossible for the individual to meet the requirement. [read post]
1 Jun 2009, 3:00 am
The Lawyers Weekly a weekly magazine which is published in Canada, has an interesting piece on Free v Paid online legal research tools. [read post]
23 Dec 2008, 2:13 pm
The decision in Bush v. [read post]
28 Sep 2017, 3:14 am
Is the claim to the artwork barred… Read More »Cassirer v Thyssen-Bornemisza: California Court revives claim to Pissarro yet again The post Cassirer v Thyssen-Bornemisza: California Court revives claim to Pissarro yet again appeared first on Art@Law. [read post]
17 Dec 2020, 4:20 am
The case pertains… Read More »Equity v Market Custom: High Court Orders Disclosure about Signac Painting The post Equity v Market Custom: High Court Orders Disclosure about Signac Painting appeared first on Art@Law. [read post]
