Search for: "Cash v. Cash"
Results 7001 - 7020
of 8,416
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Jan 2010, 8:04 am
Gertler v. [read post]
17 Jan 2010, 5:07 pm
A Nov. 12 article in the Orange County Register describes how the process allegedly worked: "In August 2008, MP-VI bought receivables of NLV, Inc. from an older fund, Medical Provider-V, for $3.39 million in cash. [read post]
17 Jan 2010, 8:45 am
Recently, the Supreme Court clarified the concept of bad faith in Lyondell Chemical Co. v. [read post]
16 Jan 2010, 7:17 am
However, no income tax deduction will be allowed for any payment made from the cash surrender value of a life insurance contract or the cash value of an annuity contract for coverage under a qualified long-term care insurance contract (Section 213(a) of the Code). [read post]
15 Jan 2010, 3:46 am
(Patent Infringement) District Court E D Texas: Defense wins JMOL at conclusion of plaintiff's case in Marshall patent trial: Southwest EFuel Network, LLC v Transaction Tracking Technologies, LLC (EDTexweblog.com) District Court E D Texas denies stays pending ex parte and inter partes reexam:Zapmedia Services, Inc. v. [read post]
14 Jan 2010, 9:00 pm
This is a factor that has negative implication to some taxpayers; therefore, it will encourage them to sell for cash and pay tax, if they do not wish to acquire replacement property. [read post]
13 Jan 2010, 6:54 am
This was the main question considered by the High Court in Delaney v Chen although some other points of interest were discussed. [read post]
13 Jan 2010, 6:54 am
This was the main question considered by the High Court in Delaney v Chen although some other points of interest were discussed. [read post]
12 Jan 2010, 4:44 pm
If you have a claim, and decline to join the class action because you want to sue individually, the defendant may be out of cash entirely. [read post]
12 Jan 2010, 3:56 pm
But it’s her adversary that comes into ridicule in Friday’s decision in Suleman v. [read post]
12 Jan 2010, 4:38 am
Reiseck v. [read post]
12 Jan 2010, 3:12 am
First credit goes to HHJ Purle QC, sitting as a judge of the High Court, who has managed the seemingly impossible task of giving judgment in such a case without reference to any authority (beyond Yeoman's Row v Cobbe, but on the quantum meruit point), despite the case being redolent (at least) of the facts in Lloyds Bank v Rosset, Midland Bank v Cooke, Coombes v Smith, Cobbe (on the estoppel point), Stack v Dowden, Thorner v Major (although… [read post]
12 Jan 2010, 3:12 am
First credit goes to HHJ Purle QC, sitting as a judge of the High Court, who has managed the seemingly impossible task of giving judgment in such a case without reference to any authority (beyond Yeoman's Row v Cobbe, but on the quantum meruit point), despite the case being redolent (at least) of the facts in Lloyds Bank v Rosset, Midland Bank v Cooke, Coombes v Smith, Cobbe (on the estoppel point), Stack v Dowden, Thorner v Major (although… [read post]
11 Jan 2010, 10:46 am
#9: Gordon v. [read post]
10 Jan 2010, 7:57 am
The seminal case with respect to this issue is Mayhue's Super Liquor Stores, Inc. v. [read post]
8 Jan 2010, 6:16 pm
In Boyd v. [read post]
8 Jan 2010, 4:43 pm
In Mossing v. [read post]
8 Jan 2010, 12:55 pm
In Howell v. [read post]
7 Jan 2010, 4:00 am
The resulting complaint was captioned (more or less) North Face v. [read post]
6 Jan 2010, 10:41 pm
(E.g., People v. [read post]
